high or low compression help
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > V6 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old February 7th, 2010, 08:25 PM   #1
Regular
 
95 mustang v6
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 419
Blog Entries: 5
mustang95 5.0 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to mustang95 5.0
Default

high or low compression help


going to put in a new 4.3 long rod stroker motor starting to save up, supersix has motors that can be built to produce 280-390 hp n/a, i have been hearing that if you wanna run a turbo setup down the road you should get a motor with lower compression to prevent engine knock. im just a little confused, i thought these strokers were built no matter what the compression to handle additional power with ease because they were fully built? I would like to get a motor with as much hp n/a and then go for a turbo kit perferably from tma, but what compression ratio would be the best for a turbo setup down the road or does it even matter?
__________________
F.O.R.D

First On Race Day

enough said

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old February 7th, 2010, 10:59 PM   #2
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
9986paulk's Avatar
 
1999 Mustang V6
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Youngstown
Posts: 1,226
9986paulk will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

yeah, compression still matters even if it is built. it would be more likely to knock with higher compression, which can and will destroy any motor over time, built or not. If im not mistaken, I think ~8.5:1 would be better. I think stock is 9.5. You could even stick with a stockish CR and run enough boost that would make great power.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2010, 11:04 PM   #3
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
JTs03v6's Avatar
 
2003 mustang
7.48x1.56=11.67
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: East Coast
Posts: 2,318
JTs03v6 has a spectacular aura aboutJTs03v6 has a spectacular aura aboutJTs03v6 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

9.5 or less with fi imo.
I would contact tom and speak with him about your future plans.
__________________
New combo: Forged SC short Block,280cfm heads, Precision 6262 turbo, cx 31x12x3 fmic



http://photobucket.com/JTsTurboBuild


http://youtube.com/user/JTsStang
  Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2010, 11:11 PM   #4
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,262
stephen has a spectacular aura aboutstephen has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

If you add a turbocharger that in effect increases compression ratio. e.g. if you run 10 psi of boost then you have a larger effective compression ratio of (14.7 +10)/14.7 =1.68. If you have an 8.5:1 compression ratio that translates to ~14.3 compression ratio with the boast, which requires a very high octane gasoline or methanol as a fuel. This is just to give you an idea. You should check with people who have actually run turbochargers to see what their experience is.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2010, 11:38 PM   #5
Regular
 
95 mustang v6
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 419
Blog Entries: 5
mustang95 5.0 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to mustang95 5.0
Default

Originally Posted by 9986paulk View Post
yeah, compression still matters even if it is built. it would be more likely to knock with higher compression, which can and will destroy any motor over time, built or not. If im not mistaken, I think ~8.5:1 would be better. I think stock is 9.5. You could even stick with a stockish CR and run enough boost that would make great power.
So before getting the motor i should make sure the compression ratio is between 8:5:1 and 9.5 to be on the safe side running f/i
__________________
F.O.R.D

First On Race Day

enough said

  Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2010, 11:40 PM   #6
Regular
 
95 mustang v6
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 419
Blog Entries: 5
mustang95 5.0 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to mustang95 5.0
Default

Originally Posted by JTs03v6 View Post
9.5 or less with fi imo.
I would contact tom and speak with him about your future plans.
Ya i plan on talking to Tom and a couple of other places to get a feel for what is the best CR t go with for f/i
__________________
F.O.R.D

First On Race Day

enough said

  Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2010, 11:48 PM   #7
Regular
 
95 mustang v6
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 419
Blog Entries: 5
mustang95 5.0 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to mustang95 5.0
Default

Originally Posted by stephen View Post
If you add a turbocharger that in effect increases compression ratio. e.g. if you run 10 psi of boost then you have a larger effective compression ratio of (14.7 +10)/14.7 =1.68. If you have an 8.5:1 compression ratio that translates to ~14.3 compression ratio with the boast, which requires a very high octane gasoline or methanol as a fuel. This is just to give you an idea. You should check with people who have actually run turbochargers to see what their experience is.
thanks very informative, trying to wrap my head around the mechanics of f/i been working on cars for a while, nothing to drastic replace and fix starting to dip my hands into some modding now, but f/i and compression have to figure it out, i figure this is the best place to ask alot of helpful and knowledgible people on these forms.
__________________
F.O.R.D

First On Race Day

enough said

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: high or low compression help
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High compression or Low? MaroonNotchback408 5.0 Mustangs 13 April 22nd, 2009 04:20 PM
Low compression vortech4.6l 96-98 0 October 4th, 2008 11:54 AM
Low Compression High Boost? e3sean 5.0 Mustangs 19 November 19th, 2007 01:13 PM
High vs. Low Compression 87StangLX General Tech 14 November 17th, 2007 10:42 PM
Low compression and low Octane? brad65 5.0 Mustangs 5 July 28th, 2006 04:53 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.