| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
|
high or low compression help
going to put in a new 4.3 long rod stroker motor starting to save up, supersix has motors that can be built to produce 280-390 hp n/a, i have been hearing that if you wanna run a turbo setup down the road you should get a motor with lower compression to prevent engine knock. im just a little confused, i thought these strokers were built no matter what the compression to handle additional power with ease because they were fully built? I would like to get a motor with as much hp n/a and then go for a turbo kit perferably from tma, but what compression ratio would be the best for a turbo setup down the road or does it even matter?
__________________
F.O.R.D First On Race Day enough said ![]()
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1999 Mustang V6
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Youngstown
Posts: 1,226
![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
yeah, compression still matters even if it is built. it would be more likely to knock with higher compression, which can and will destroy any motor over time, built or not. If im not mistaken, I think ~8.5:1 would be better. I think stock is 9.5. You could even stick with a stockish CR and run enough boost that would make great power.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2003 mustang
7.48x1.56=11.67
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: East Coast
Posts: 2,318
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
9.5 or less with fi imo.
I would contact tom and speak with him about your future plans.
__________________
New combo: Forged SC short Block,280cfm heads, Precision 6262 turbo, cx 31x12x3 fmic ![]() ![]() http://photobucket.com/JTsTurboBuild http://youtube.com/user/JTsStang |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,262
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If you add a turbocharger that in effect increases compression ratio. e.g. if you run 10 psi of boost then you have a larger effective compression ratio of (14.7 +10)/14.7 =1.68. If you have an 8.5:1 compression ratio that translates to ~14.3 compression ratio with the boast, which requires a very high octane gasoline or methanol as a fuel. This is just to give you an idea. You should check with people who have actually run turbochargers to see what their experience is.
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Regular
|
__________________
F.O.R.D First On Race Day enough said ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
|
Ya i plan on talking to Tom and a couple of other places to get a feel for what is the best CR t go with for f/i
__________________
F.O.R.D First On Race Day enough said ![]()
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Regular
|
__________________
F.O.R.D First On Race Day enough said ![]()
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: high or low compression help
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High compression or Low? | MaroonNotchback408 | 5.0 Mustangs | 13 | April 22nd, 2009 04:20 PM |
| Low compression | vortech4.6l | 96-98 | 0 | October 4th, 2008 11:54 AM |
| Low Compression High Boost? | e3sean | 5.0 Mustangs | 19 | November 19th, 2007 01:13 PM |
| High vs. Low Compression | 87StangLX | General Tech | 14 | November 17th, 2007 10:42 PM |
| Low compression and low Octane? | brad65 | 5.0 Mustangs | 5 | July 28th, 2006 04:53 PM |