| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saginaw, Texas
Posts: 1,381
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
http://rides.webshots.com/photo/1090...28849535DhtwRV
i dont care how much boost your running you cant outpower a true stage 3 blower with some puny ass turbo
__________________
I don't drive fast. I fly slow.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 1,583
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
i had to write a persuasive paper and i dont know how persuasive it is but i tried.
here it is for all http://www.sharebigfile.com/file/137308/FI-2--rtf.html
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
turbos pwn street/strip but top fuel dragster use s/c. mainly because a dodge truck with a hemi doesnt have enough power to even turn the pulley.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saginaw, Texas
Posts: 1,381
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
theres no way to know for sure.. you have to have a TRUE BLOWER on a car vs a turbo'd car of the same exact setup.. EVERYTHING MUST BE EXACT.. rims, tires, weigh, tranny set up, EVERYTHING and youll never see that so you cant prove anything "facts" are not present so dont say its facts
True Blowers create more power.. end of story
__________________
I don't drive fast. I fly slow.
|
|
|
|
#27 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
#28 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saginaw, Texas
Posts: 1,381
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
I don't drive fast. I fly slow.
|
||
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Enthusiast
|
ook soo back to the topic..haha...would it benefit me to do the project over a turbo..or a new rear axle
__________________
If you aren't first.....your last!
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 1,583
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Enthusiast
|
would it be easier..and i have what else would i have to do to the engine to make the turbo work??if that makes any sense??
__________________
If you aren't first.....your last!
|
|
|
|
#32 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 1,583
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
PM cricket..he's the turbo guy around here.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Enthusiast
|
aight thanks
__________________
If you aren't first.....your last!
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Regular
1998 mustang GT
14.02@98.25
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 255
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
a turbo setup will cost you a pretty penny though, but in the end turbo is better because its free hp/tq compared to supercharger that uses at least 20% of engine power to create more power. the reason not many turbos are ran on the strip is because they are unreliable, ive seen it plenty of time, and the power band is not constant and with a big turbo you get a huge power boost in the middle of your powerband
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Banned
2003 V6 Mustang
14.2 @ 96
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 644
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
WTF!? God I want to hurt you right now! Making me all excited to answer a question only to find out its over 2 years old.
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
The answer wasn't all that great anyway.
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Newbie
1982 Mustang/Capri Hybrid
8.780@154.000
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Clarkston, Mi
Posts: 13
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
The rear end would be easier any day. You really wanna pull the motor if you don't gotta?
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Not Banned
|
Facepalm!
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
The simplest logic that I can see is that superchargers have parasitic loss, turbos do not. So all else being equal, a motor with a supercharger will have more parasitic loss than a motor with a turbocharger, and thus transmit less power to the transmission.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ Buy my Bronco, special deal for MM folks |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Which one is easier??a rear end swap or engine swap?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can't decide, engine swap or PI swap? A few questions... | k3vin | 96-98 | 24 | September 5th, 2007 07:48 PM |
| 8.8 rear swap | Pharoh | V6 Mustangs | 3 | July 19th, 2007 02:22 AM |
| Rear end swap | 00RoushV6 | V6 Mustangs | 26 | April 4th, 2007 10:44 PM |
| 8.8 rear swap | Orangester | V6 Mustangs | 2 | January 23rd, 2007 08:00 PM |
| rear swap lin lsc to must. lx | buckwild | General Tech | 6 | May 21st, 2006 09:37 PM |