Help

Southern Savage 4 · February 3rd, 2011, 08:30 PM

Ford Racing Mustang C-Springs (79-04) at AmericanMuscle.com - Free Shipping!

anyone know anything about these? would they be good enough lol? i dont wanna have to buy cc plates i want just springs

mcqueen · February 3rd, 2011, 08:40 PM

I've never really heard anybody complain about them. Considering they're FR the quality should be good. The drop is under 1.5" so you won't need CC plates. I would personally go with the B springs (Ford Racing Mustang B-Springs (79-04) at AmericanMuscle.com - Free Shipping!) for the lower front end rather than having the car sit fairly level.

Mr. Red Pony · February 3rd, 2011, 09:50 PM

I have 'B's on the way. I want progressive rate spring for a smoother ride.

Southern Savage 4 · February 3rd, 2011, 11:28 PM

Originally Posted by mcqueen

I've never really heard anybody complain about them. Considering they're FR the quality should be good. The drop is under 1.5" so you won't need CC plates. I would personally go with the B springs (Ford Racing Mustang B-Springs (79-04) at AmericanMuscle.com - Free Shipping!) for the lower front end rather than having the car sit fairly level.

Wait what you mean by this lol?

6ER THEN I 8ER! · February 3rd, 2011, 11:30 PM

Originally Posted by Southern Savage 4

Wait what you mean by this lol?

a lower front man...it's what makes our cars look so aggressive

Rich J · February 3rd, 2011, 11:32 PM

But both the B's and C's say they lower by 1.25... Does the progressive part make it sit lower or something?

But then again wouldn't keeping the ISO's in the back make it sit just a tad higher?

SlowSix · February 4th, 2011, 12:09 AM

CJ PONY PARTS PRO KIT LOWERING SPRINGS 1979-2004 FORD MUSTANG | CJ Pony Parts

CJ Pony Parts has these, which are Eibachs just rebranded it seems. This one says v8, but there is a kit that comes with iso's too and it says v8/v6.

Edit.: Scratch that, it says v6 verts. Damnit. I want a GT.

Rich J · February 4th, 2011, 12:56 AM

:O I is a vert!

mcqueen · February 4th, 2011, 01:05 AM

Originally Posted by demon_54

But both the B's and C's say they lower by 1.25... Does the progressive part make it sit lower or something? But then again wouldn't keeping the ISO's in the back make it sit just a tad higher?

Both springs are the same lb/in for the rear. The C springs are 650 lb/in in the front and the B springs are 425/530 lb/in in the front. So they both sit the same in the rear but the B springs will sit lower in the front. It'll give that jacked-up rear look.

Rich J · February 4th, 2011, 01:10 AM

So is the ones on CJ Pony Parts the same thing? Like make the front a little lower than the rear? If so I think I will just grab these myself. Is that why 2 look different than the other 2?

Mr. Red Pony · February 4th, 2011, 01:45 AM

Originally Posted by mcqueen

Both springs are the same lb/in for the rear. The C springs are 650 lb/in in the front and the B springs are 425/530 lb/in in the front. So they both sit the same in the rear but the B springs will sit lower in the front. It'll give that jacked-up rear look.

Which is ganna make my car look killer. Mine sits a little lower in the back right now..

February 3rd, 2011, 08:30 PM	#1
Southern Savage 4 Regular 2004 Mustang V6 Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Louisiana Posts: 176 iTrader: 0 reviews	Help Ford Racing Mustang C-Springs (79-04) at AmericanMuscle.com - Free Shipping! anyone know anything about these? would they be good enough lol? i dont wanna have to buy cc plates i want just springs

February 3rd, 2011, 09:50 PM	#3
Mr. Red Pony Resident badass 01 Built V6 (3.9) 13.91 @ 99.1 N/A Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Lawton, Oklahomo Posts: 6,789 iTrader: 10 reviews	I have 'B's on the way. I want progressive rate spring for a smoother ride. __________________ 271rwhp N/A V6 The Name is Danny. I'm a GM Technician. Suck it.

February 3rd, 2011, 11:32 PM	#6
Rich J I'm doing it wrong 04 Grand Cherokee Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: South Eastern, Mass Posts: 5,211 iTrader: 0 reviews	But both the B's and C's say they lower by 1.25... Does the progressive part make it sit lower or something? But then again wouldn't keeping the ISO's in the back make it sit just a tad higher? __________________ Formerly known as Demon_54 "I feel the same way about disco as I do about herpes." - Hunter S. Thompson

February 4th, 2011, 12:09 AM	#7
SlowSix Formerly 01silversixer 2001 V6 15.47@89.57 Join Date: May 2010 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 3,471 iTrader: 1 reviews	CJ PONY PARTS PRO KIT LOWERING SPRINGS 1979-2004 FORD MUSTANG \| CJ Pony Parts CJ Pony Parts has these, which are Eibachs just rebranded it seems. This one says v8, but there is a kit that comes with iso's too and it says v8/v6. Edit.: Scratch that, it says v6 verts. Damnit. I want a GT. __________________ Build Thread

February 4th, 2011, 12:56 AM	#8
Rich J I'm doing it wrong 04 Grand Cherokee Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: South Eastern, Mass Posts: 5,211 iTrader: 0 reviews	:O I is a vert! __________________ Formerly known as Demon_54 "I feel the same way about disco as I do about herpes." - Hunter S. Thompson

February 4th, 2011, 01:10 AM	#10
Rich J I'm doing it wrong 04 Grand Cherokee Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: South Eastern, Mass Posts: 5,211 iTrader: 0 reviews	So is the ones on CJ Pony Parts the same thing? Like make the front a little lower than the rear? If so I think I will just grab these myself. Is that why 2 look different than the other 2? __________________ Formerly known as Demon_54 "I feel the same way about disco as I do about herpes." - Hunter S. Thompson

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Ford Mustang Forum Advertisement

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 PM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs : Ford Mustang Forums - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.