[El_Cangri]

Well first of all I posted this so It can help ppl out and know how do they match-up

1. Ford:
1.a 94-98 Mustangs:
1.a Engine specifications:
3.8L 145 hp V6
Horsepower 145 @ 4000 RPM *note 96-98 +5 h.p
Torque (lb-ft) 215 @ 2750 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration 12/OHV
Displacement (cc) 3802
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.81 X 3.39
Compression Ratio 9.0:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI

1.b 99-04 Mustangs:
1.b Engine Specifications:
3.8L 190 hp V6
Horsepower 190 @ 5250 RPM
Torque (lb-ft) 220 @ 2750 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration 12/OHV
Displacement (cc) 3802
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.80 X 3.40
Compression Ratio 9.3:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI

1.c 05-07 Mustangs
1.c Engine Specifications
4.0L 210 hp V6
Horsepower 210 @ 5300 RPM
Torque (lb-ft) 240 @ 3500 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration 12/SOHC
Displacement (cc) 4009
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.95 X 3.32
Compression Ratio 9.7:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI

2.Toyota
2.a 94-99 Celica:
2.a Engine Specifications
ST GT
1.8L 110 hp I4 | 2.2L 135 hp I4
Horsepower 110 | 135 @ 5200 RPM
Torque (lb-ft) No data | 142 @ 4400 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration No data |16/DOHC
Displacement (cc) 1844 |2198
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.27 X 3.3 | 3.39 X 3.72
Compression Ratio 9.0:1 | 9.5:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/EFI |Gas/SEFI

*Note 96-99 has a decreased of 5 h.p and an increas of 2 in torque in the 98 and 99 models the 1.8 was not equiped they all had 2.2L...

2.b 00-05 Celica:
2.b Engine Specifications
ST GT
1.8L 140 hp I4 | 1.8L 180 hp I4
Horsepower 140 @ 6400 RPM | 180 @ 7600 RPM
Torque (lb-ft) 125 @ 4200 RPM | 130 @ 6800 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration 16/DOHC| 16/DOHC
Displacement (cc) 1794 |1796
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.11 X 3.60 | 3.23 X 3.35
Compression Ratio 10.0:1 | 11.5:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/MPFI | Gas/SEFI

3.Chevy
3.a 93-97 Camaro:
Engine Specifications:
93-95 96-97
3.4L 160 hp V6 |3.8L 200 hp v6
Horsepower 160 |200 @ 5200 RPM
Torque (lb-ft) 200 |225 @ 4000 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration No data | 12/OHV
Displacement (cc) 3392 |3785
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.62 X 3.31 |3.80 X 3.40
Compression Ratio 9.0:1 |9.4:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI |Gas/SEFI


3.b 98-02 Camaro
Engine Specifications:
*They are the same as the 96-97 Camaro

4. Hyundai
4.1 97-2001 Tiburon:
Engine Specifications
*Note the 97 was the only one with the 1.8L option
Base FX
1.8L 130 hp I4 | 2.0L 140 hp I4
Horsepower 130 @ 6000 RPM |140 @ 6000 RPM
Torque (lb-ft) 126 @ 4200 RPM | 133 @ 4800 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration 16/DOHC |16/DOHC
Displacement (cc) 1794 |1975
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.11 X 3.60 | 3.23 X 3.68
Compression Ratio 10.0:1 | 10.3:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/EFI | Gas/MPFI

4.2 03-06 Tiburon:
*Note 04-06 has h.p increased by 2 on both engines
compression and bore X Stroke got change just a lil bit

Engine Specifications
Base GT V6
2.0L 134 hp I4 | 2.7L 170 hp V6
Horsepower 134 @ 6000 RPM | 170 @ 6000 RPM
Torque (lb-ft) 132 @ 4500 RPM | 181 @ 4000 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration 16/DOHC |24/DOHC
Displacement (cc) 1975 | 2656
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.22 X 3.68 | 3.41 X 2.95
Compression Ratio 10.3:1 | 10.0:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/MPFI | Gas/MPFI


Well people this is all for now later I'm gonna add more cars and 1/4 mile speeds hope this info can help you out. If you want me to post more info like car weigth specific makes/models tell me I want this to have all the Info of V6's so people will know how do they match-up... Ohh I'm also gonna try to post in suspension and other info that can be consider valuable.......

-Louis Alexander (El_Cangri)

[turp]

Umm this is all well and good but what the heck does a tiburon's engine specs have to do with a V6 mustang? This is the V6 tech forum not other makes and model forum.

[JASonic]

I think its interesting because alot of tiberon owners like to try and get "tough" at stop lights. I like to know what Im up against... and Im lazy so I rarely leave the V-6 forum. I think its good data where ever its posted.

[GreenFaleen]

i think it is more see where the v6 stands in correlation to other v6's

[El_Cangri]

Turp I just posted this so the mustang v6 owners can know how they matchup with other cars cause all I see is people saying that our's v6 are the slowest... With this people can learn something.... Maybe some people think Tinuron are faster well they r not.... I want to inform other people...

[Onemanzu]

thanks dude... so i don't need to much more to own my friends maro? thats nice to know thanks dude

[MustanG_guy17]

Originally Posted by El_Cangri Well first of all I posted this so It can help ppl out and know how do they match-up 1. Ford: 1.a 94-98 Mustangs: 1.a Engine specifications: 3.8L 145 hp V6 Horsepower 145 @ 4000 RPM *note 96-98 +5 h.p Torque (lb-ft) 215 @ 2750 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 12/OHV Displacement (cc) 3802 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.81 X 3.39 Compression Ratio 9.0:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI 1.b 99-04 Mustangs: 1.b Engine Specifications: 3.8L 190 hp V6 Horsepower 190 @ 5250 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 220 @ 2750 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 12/OHV Displacement (cc) 3802 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.80 X 3.40 Compression Ratio 9.3:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI 1.c 05-07 Mustangs 1.c Engine Specifications 4.0L 210 hp V6 Horsepower 210 @ 5300 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 240 @ 3500 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 12/SOHC Displacement (cc) 4009 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.95 X 3.32 Compression Ratio 9.7:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI 2.Toyota 2.a 94-99 Celica: 2.a Engine Specifications ST GT 1.8L 110 hp I4 | 2.2L 135 hp I4 Horsepower 110 | 135 @ 5200 RPM Torque (lb-ft) No data | 142 @ 4400 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration No data |16/DOHC Displacement (cc) 1844 |2198 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.27 X 3.3 | 3.39 X 3.72 Compression Ratio 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/EFI |Gas/SEFI *Note 96-99 has a decreased of 5 h.p and an increas of 2 in torque in the 98 and 99 models the 1.8 was not equiped they all had 2.2L... 2.b 00-05 Celica: 2.b Engine Specifications ST GT 1.8L 140 hp I4 | 1.8L 180 hp I4 Horsepower 140 @ 6400 RPM | 180 @ 7600 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 125 @ 4200 RPM | 130 @ 6800 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 16/DOHC| 16/DOHC Displacement (cc) 1794 |1796 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.11 X 3.60 | 3.23 X 3.35 Compression Ratio 10.0:1 | 11.5:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/MPFI | Gas/SEFI 3.Chevy 3.a 93-97 Camaro: Engine Specifications: 93-95 96-97 3.4L 160 hp V6 |3.8L 200 hp v6 Horsepower 160 |200 @ 5200 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 200 |225 @ 4000 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration No data | 12/OHV Displacement (cc) 3392 |3785 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.62 X 3.31 |3.80 X 3.40 Compression Ratio 9.0:1 |9.4:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI |Gas/SEFI 3.b 98-02 Camaro Engine Specifications: *They are the same as the 96-97 Camaro 4. Hyundai 4.1 97-2001 Tiburon: Engine Specifications *Note the 97 was the only one with the 1.8L option Base FX 1.8L 130 hp I4 | 2.0L 140 hp I4 Horsepower 130 @ 6000 RPM |140 @ 6000 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 126 @ 4200 RPM | 133 @ 4800 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 16/DOHC |16/DOHC Displacement (cc) 1794 |1975 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.11 X 3.60 | 3.23 X 3.68 Compression Ratio 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/EFI | Gas/MPFI 4.2 03-06 Tiburon: *Note 04-06 has h.p increased by 2 on both engines compression and bore X Stroke got change just a lil bit Engine Specifications Base GT V6 2.0L 134 hp I4 | 2.7L 170 hp V6 Horsepower 134 @ 6000 RPM | 170 @ 6000 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 132 @ 4500 RPM | 181 @ 4000 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 16/DOHC |24/DOHC Displacement (cc) 1975 | 2656 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.22 X 3.68 | 3.41 X 2.95 Compression Ratio 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/MPFI | Gas/MPFI Well people this is all for now later I'm gonna add more cars and 1/4 mile speeds hope this info can help you out. If you want me to post more info like car weigth specific makes/models tell me I want this to have all the Info of V6's so people will know how do they match-up... Ohh I'm also gonna try to post in suspension and other info that can be consider valuable....... -Louis Alexander (El_Cangri)

01-04 recieved a +3hp.. and +5Torqe.

[mustang1072]

Originally Posted by GreenFaleen i think it is more see where the v6 stands in correlation to other v6's

i agree +1

[ESG-642T]

Originally Posted by Onemanzu thanks dude... so i don't need to much more to own my friends maro? thats nice to know thanks dude

The 3.8L camaro should not be taken lightly lol...

[ByPopularDemand]

Ha ha i love racing maros

[ESG-642T]

Yeah their fun now, but Stock v Stock .... Ewww

[ByPopularDemand]

When I was stock i could take the 3.4's...and the 3.8 were always a good race...now I use em as ego boosts after losin a race

[itschristorres8]

Originally Posted by MustanG_guy17 Originally Posted by El_Cangri Well first of all I posted this so It can help ppl out and know how do they match-up 1. Ford: 1.a 94-98 Mustangs: 1.a Engine specifications: 3.8L 145 hp V6 Horsepower 145 @ 4000 RPM *note 96-98 +5 h.p Torque (lb-ft) 215 @ 2750 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 12/OHV Displacement (cc) 3802 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.81 X 3.39 Compression Ratio 9.0:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI 1.b 99-04 Mustangs: 1.b Engine Specifications: 3.8L 190 hp V6 Horsepower 190 @ 5250 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 220 @ 2750 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 12/OHV Displacement (cc) 3802 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.80 X 3.40 Compression Ratio 9.3:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI 1.c 05-07 Mustangs 1.c Engine Specifications 4.0L 210 hp V6 Horsepower 210 @ 5300 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 240 @ 3500 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 12/SOHC Displacement (cc) 4009 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.95 X 3.32 Compression Ratio 9.7:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI 2.Toyota 2.a 94-99 Celica: 2.a Engine Specifications ST GT 1.8L 110 hp I4 | 2.2L 135 hp I4 Horsepower 110 | 135 @ 5200 RPM Torque (lb-ft) No data | 142 @ 4400 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration No data |16/DOHC Displacement (cc) 1844 |2198 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.27 X 3.3 | 3.39 X 3.72 Compression Ratio 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/EFI |Gas/SEFI *Note 96-99 has a decreased of 5 h.p and an increas of 2 in torque in the 98 and 99 models the 1.8 was not equiped they all had 2.2L... 2.b 00-05 Celica: 2.b Engine Specifications ST GT 1.8L 140 hp I4 | 1.8L 180 hp I4 Horsepower 140 @ 6400 RPM | 180 @ 7600 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 125 @ 4200 RPM | 130 @ 6800 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 16/DOHC| 16/DOHC Displacement (cc) 1794 |1796 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.11 X 3.60 | 3.23 X 3.35 Compression Ratio 10.0:1 | 11.5:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/MPFI | Gas/SEFI 3.Chevy 3.a 93-97 Camaro: Engine Specifications: 93-95 96-97 3.4L 160 hp V6 |3.8L 200 hp v6 Horsepower 160 |200 @ 5200 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 200 |225 @ 4000 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration No data | 12/OHV Displacement (cc) 3392 |3785 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.62 X 3.31 |3.80 X 3.40 Compression Ratio 9.0:1 |9.4:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/SEFI |Gas/SEFI 3.b 98-02 Camaro Engine Specifications: *They are the same as the 96-97 Camaro 4. Hyundai 4.1 97-2001 Tiburon: Engine Specifications *Note the 97 was the only one with the 1.8L option Base FX 1.8L 130 hp I4 | 2.0L 140 hp I4 Horsepower 130 @ 6000 RPM |140 @ 6000 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 126 @ 4200 RPM | 133 @ 4800 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 16/DOHC |16/DOHC Displacement (cc) 1794 |1975 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.11 X 3.60 | 3.23 X 3.68 Compression Ratio 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/EFI | Gas/MPFI 4.2 03-06 Tiburon: *Note 04-06 has h.p increased by 2 on both engines compression and bore X Stroke got change just a lil bit Engine Specifications Base GT V6 2.0L 134 hp I4 | 2.7L 170 hp V6 Horsepower 134 @ 6000 RPM | 170 @ 6000 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 132 @ 4500 RPM | 181 @ 4000 RPM Valves/Valve Configuration 16/DOHC |24/DOHC Displacement (cc) 1975 | 2656 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.22 X 3.68 | 3.41 X 2.95 Compression Ratio 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 Fuel Type/System Gas/MPFI | Gas/MPFI Well people this is all for now later I'm gonna add more cars and 1/4 mile speeds hope this info can help you out. If you want me to post more info like car weigth specific makes/models tell me I want this to have all the Info of V6's so people will know how do they match-up... Ohh I'm also gonna try to post in suspension and other info that can be consider valuable....... -Louis Alexander (El_Cangri) 01-04 recieved a +3hp.. and +5Torqe.

only in 04 did they make 3.9L
from half of 00 most 99-00 hav same crank set up
01-04 have slight different crank design if you've notice if you've ever looked into or bought underdrive pulleys

but the only power difference is the 3.9L 2004 V6

[GreenFaleen]

stock for stock with equal drivers the mustang will win.

[ByPopularDemand]

Yeah and we look better doing it

[mustang1072]

Originally Posted by GreenFaleen stock for stock with equal drivers the mustang will win.

so if i was a stock 00 mustang v6... and i went up against a stock 00 maro... both 5spds i would win?

[ByPopularDemand]

More than likely...my auto vert has taken a few 00 maro's

[mustang1072]

hmm good to know

[ESG-642T]

Originally Posted by GreenFaleen stock for stock with equal drivers the mustang will win.

..

The 3.8 camaro S4S w/perfectly equal drivers will win 99.8% time
The 3.4L can ALMOST keep up with a 99-04 v6 mustang...

v6cam > v6 stang
z28 > mach 1 / 99-01 cobra
ss < 03 eaton cobra

[GreenFaleen]

Originally Posted by SSStang Originally Posted by GreenFaleen stock for stock with equal drivers the mustang will win. .. The 3.8 camaro S4S w/perfectly equal drivers will win 99.8% time The 3.4L can ALMOST keep up with a 99-04 v6 mustang... v6cam > v6 stang z28 > mach 1 / 99-01 cobra ss < 03 eaton cobra

sry but your wrong there, the camaro is heavier than the mustang , the driveshaft is also longer. this is talking about the 3.8 camaro and it will lose to the 99+ v6's it is simple fact with a pro driver in each the mustang can go a 15.5 and the best with a 3800 camaro was a 15.9 there is not a faster recorded time for a stock one.
v6 stang > v6 maro
z28 ls1 > gt, and 99-01 cobra
ss=z28 same car different appearance package they might as well be equal cars.