05 V6 Mustang Compared to 1994-1998 Stock Supras.

June 6th, 2007, 11:00 AM

#21

ChrisJ

MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO

2002 Mustang GT

SLOW

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky

Posts: 16,252

Originally Posted by SSStang

Originally Posted by petrol_head

Originally Posted by SSStang

Originally Posted by texas_mustang

dude. fuck it all. get an srt-4

Supra > srt4

vw r32>supra>srt4

if your going to go import, might as well make it worth your while
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2004-...QQcmdZViewItem

That ish ugly

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/94-TO...QQcmdZViewItem

Me personally I would rather have the R32...I love those little cars...

__________________
My Junk

www.myspace.com/cjobe

June 6th, 2007, 12:25 PM	#22
Stang4sure Newbie Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 2	Damn, getting alot of mixed answer lol. Just to lay it out my price range is 15-22 thousand. This meens any supra i get would be from 1994-98 and would have anywhere from 50-80 thousand miles on it. Chances are it would not be turbo at that price. Now an 05 Mustang V6 would cost me about 16-18 with only about 5-20 thousand miles on it. Im lookin for the faster car and the car with more potential but at the same time i want somtin that can last me a good 5 years.

June 6th, 2007, 03:25 PM

#23

VSR13

Regular

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: Houston, Texas

Posts: 494

Originally Posted by SSStang

lol the GT500-SS is gonna be like 50-60k range :p

I'de much rather have a twin turbo supra converted to a single 76mm or so

+1000000

June 6th, 2007, 03:30 PM

#24

ChrisJ

MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO

2002 Mustang GT

SLOW

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky

Posts: 16,252

Originally Posted by Stang4sure

Damn, getting alot of mixed answer lol.

Just to lay it out my price range is 15-22 thousand.

This meens any supra i get would be from 1994-98 and would have anywhere from 50-80 thousand miles on it.

Chances are it would not be turbo at that price.

Now an 05 Mustang V6 would cost me about 16-18 with only about 5-20 thousand miles on it.

Im lookin for the faster car and the car with more potential but at the same time i want somtin that can last me a good 5 years.

Is the R32 an option?

__________________
My Junk

www.myspace.com/cjobe

June 6th, 2007, 03:35 PM

#25

petrol_head

Newbie

Join Date: Jun 2007

Posts: 42

Is the R32 an option?

it keeps getting cooler and cooler the more i look at it

__________________
2008 4.6L. 5 spd and stock. 7 Days Old.

June 6th, 2007, 03:41 PM

#26

ChrisJ

MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO

2002 Mustang GT

SLOW

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky

Posts: 16,252

Its really a cool car...

Originally Posted by Wikipedia/R32

R32 (2004)

In 2002, Volkswagen produced the Golf R32 in Europe as a 2003 model. Due to unexpected popularity, Volkswagen (through Volkswagen of America) decided to sell the car in the United States as the 2004 Volkswagen R32. Billed as the pinnacle of the Golf IV platform, the R32 included every performance, safety, and luxury feature VW had to offer including the all new 3.2 L 24-valve VR6 engine producing a claimed 241 bhp and 236 lb ft of torque (it is commonly thought the U.S. R32 received the higher output Audi TT motor producing 250 bhp), AWD, a new 6-speed manual transmission, independent rear suspension, automatic climate control, sport seats from Koenig, 18" OZ Aristo wheels, Electronic Stability Programme, massive (334 mm) brakes, sunroof, and model specific bodywork. The vehicle was available in only four colors: Black Magic Pearl, Deep Blue Pearl, Reflex Silver, and Tornado Red.

The distribution of colors were as follows:
Deep Blue Pearl: 40%
Reflex Silver: 35%
Black Magic Pearl: 15%
Tornado Red: 10%

Although the R32 shared a similar appearance with the 25th Anniversary GTI, the R32 shared the vast majority of its major components with the 3.2 L Audi TT, most notably, the engine, all wheel drive system, and both front and rear suspension geometries. Five thousand cars were produced and intended to be sold over a two-year period, but the entire line was sold out within 13 months.

The Golf R32's competitors (at the time of production) were the Subaru Impreza WRX STi and the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII, although, unlike these cars, the R32 was not sponsored by Volkswagen in rally competitions. Instead of testing the car by participating in WRC Rally Racing, VW focused on the stability and drivability in everyday conditions, creating a car that cannot be compared to the Subaru Impreza WRX STi or Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII.

The R32 remains the quickest car that Volkswagen has imported to the U.S., capable of 60 mph in only 5.8 seconds, and clearing the quarter mile in only 14.1 seconds at 99.2 mph (Faster even than the new 2008 R32 destined to hit showrooms August 2007). The R32 edges out its fastest sibling, the top-of-the-line Phaeton 6.0 litre W12 (414 bhp), by a tenth of a second at the 1320 foot mark.

Its one of the few VW's I would EVER sport...

__________________
My Junk

www.myspace.com/cjobe

June 6th, 2007, 04:28 PM	#27
ByPopularDemand Hardcore Enthusiast 2000 V6 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Albuquerque Posts: 2,410	I wouldn't...I'd take something good looking and slow...and to the ts a non turbo supra is slower than a 05+ V6 __________________ 2000 V6 Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive crank pulley, SCT tune, and a buncha cosmetic mods

June 6th, 2007, 06:04 PM	#28
bwb3 Regular Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Gainesville,Fl Posts: 98	ok....you have 15-22k? there are so many other options for a fast car with that. get an 03 cobra. or something of that nature. hell you could make a low 10 second foxbody with that. but if you must get one of those two get the supra. its easy to make itgo fast. __________________ i have fast cars....

June 6th, 2007, 06:23 PM	#29
ByPopularDemand Hardcore Enthusiast 2000 V6 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Albuquerque Posts: 2,410	Its easy if its the tt supra __________________ 2000 V6 Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive crank pulley, SCT tune, and a buncha cosmetic mods

June 6th, 2007, 06:23 PM	#30
ckthecerealkiller Enthusiast Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Windsor CO Posts: 936	03/04 Mach 1 FTW! Cobras are a little overrated IMO, power is way too on the high end and you can make a Mach1 faster for less than a cobra since it has the solid rear end. A cobra is usually like 25-30k. Mach1's average around 20-22k and you can get a K/B supercharger for the extra $$$ and have a good 400-450hp. __________________

June 6th, 2007, 07:22 PM

#31

Onemanzu

MM Phantom

Join Date: Oct 2006

Location: looking for free hand jobs in poland springs nebraska... silly gooses

Posts: 11,169

just buy HMUSN's car... 11k fully built just needs new rims and tires...

good deal i think... 400 somethin horse power and never been to the track on that engine...

I personally like the 2dr Jetta GLi Mk2 16v 5spd... that is my personal favorite euro car right now... wish i could afford one... T_T dont even have $600 to buy one

I would get a 01-02 GT mustang... that would be the best year... just a couple of miles... but a lil old... good body style no switches in the production of them... thats what i want some day

__________________
Back for brotherly love. My thoughts are with you Bubba!! [9-23-08]

Originally Posted by omz

How to search
Nebraska!
CRT Performance

June 6th, 2007, 07:44 PM

#32

02ponypackage

MM Fanatic

Join Date: Oct 2006

Location: Central FL

Posts: 3,420

Originally Posted by ckthecerealkiller

03/04 Mach 1 FTW! Cobras are a little overrated IMO, power is way too on the high end and you can make a Mach1 faster for less than a cobra since it has the solid rear end. A cobra is usually like 25-30k. Mach1's average around 20-22k and you can get a K/B supercharger for the extra $$$ and have a good 400-450hp.

you can get a 03-04 Cobra for the same price of a Mach1...ive seen Cobras going for 20-21 with no more then 35,000 miles...some stock some not for the same range....and u can do easy bolt ons on a Cobra and see a lot better response over a Mach1 thanks to the SC but the Mach1 does haul ass for an all motor car.....the compression are high in them so turbos arent the easiest things to get done over a SC....but neways for 15 your not getting a TT 4th gen Supra(93-98)....nor a R32 with low miles....for 15,000 you can get a Turbo'd Mustang GT (99-04)....theres one buy me for 16 making about 425rwhp on pretty low boost...with decent miles since its a 2002 about 40,000

__________________
just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood

June 6th, 2007, 07:46 PM	#33
02ponypackage MM Fanatic Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Central FL Posts: 3,420	oh and u think Cobra are over rated ? 2.8 pulley swap,LTs,Intake,exhaust,drag radials, a nice Dyno Tune and your already in the mid low 11s pending driver skills __________________ just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood

June 6th, 2007, 08:01 PM

#34

232stang

Hardcore Enthusiast

1995 BMW 325i

Join Date: Nov 2006

Location: houston, texas

Posts: 2,861

if it were me i would get a 01 cobra, 99-04 gt, the supra, mach 1, or 03-04 cobra. assuming prices are good. dont waste your money on a v6.

__________________
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...5/cpc1copy.jpg

Originally Posted by Cesar2cool

lol i use my car for speed

June 6th, 2007, 09:40 PM

#35

ckthecerealkiller

Enthusiast

Join Date: Oct 2005

Location: Windsor CO

Posts: 936

Originally Posted by 02ponypackage

oh and u think Cobra are over rated ? 2.8 pulley swap,LTs,Intake,exhaust,drag radials, a nice Dyno Tune and your already in the mid low 11s pending driver skills

Yah but your not really going to get anywhere below 10's without a new rear end. Yah they are nice but they are a bitch to launch and just arent worth the extra effort when you can get something thats cheaper and still fast and almost the same.

You could get the low 11's with the Mach 1 for about the same price and still have somewhere to go without getting a new rear end.

Also, the cheapest I've ever seen an 03/04 cobra go for is 23k

June 6th, 2007, 09:59 PM	#36
02ponypackage MM Fanatic Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Central FL Posts: 3,420	first off u drive a V6 ^...2nd u wouldnt know shit about launching...3rd Ive seen my share of 10sec cobra on IRS with no problems...its called suspension upgrades and driving...read up on it sometime...also if 23 is the cheapest you've seen then that may be true...but lets leave it up to the guy who sees them on the road here all the time...and see the prices people sell them for...also about that below 10s....did u even know Cobras have Independent Rear Suspension ? or do you know what it is ? .......and trust me cars running 9s and lower have more then a Fully built rear end...and they also would have another daily driver since 9 second daily driven and well maintained on the street is something u dont hear about...c'mon below 10s ? no1 is talking about 9 second cars...internet smack just for taking the time to type such non sense __________________ just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood

June 6th, 2007, 10:13 PM

#37

chevy_killer

Enthusiast

2000 v6 Mustang

Join Date: Nov 2006

Location: Winter Haven Florida

Posts: 943

Originally Posted by Stang4sure

Damn, getting alot of mixed answer lol.

Just to lay it out my price range is 15-22 thousand.

This meens any supra i get would be from 1994-98 and would have anywhere from 50-80 thousand miles on it.

Chances are it would not be turbo at that price.

Now an 05 Mustang V6 would cost me about 16-18 with only about 5-20 thousand miles on it.

Im lookin for the faster car and the car with more potential but at the same time i want somtin that can last me a good 5 years.

if you have that much get an 03-04 cobra...ive seen them go for 15k on ebay...and if you do buy a cobra swap the sc for a tt and you can make 800+ hp on that alone

__________________
The LS1 was finally subjected to a paternity test, and it's daddy was to '03 Cobra

June 7th, 2007, 02:47 AM

#38

GatoStang

Regular

2002 V6 Mustang

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: San Diego, CA

Posts: 213

Originally Posted by SSStang

lol the GT500-SS is gonna be like 50-60k range :p

I'de much rather have a twin turbo supra converted to a single 76mm or so

but wouldnt it be nice to have a Super Snake???

__________________
Ghost Ride The Whip!!!

June 7th, 2007, 09:48 AM

#39

ChrisJ

MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO

2002 Mustang GT

SLOW

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky

Posts: 16,252

Originally Posted by Onemanzu

I would get a 01-02 GT mustang... that would be the best year... just a couple of miles... but a lil old... good body style no switches in the production of them... thats what i want some day

Um yeah there is differences...

01 has a T45 < 02 has a 3650

And there are others...

__________________
My Junk

www.myspace.com/cjobe

June 9th, 2007, 08:57 AM

#40

ckthecerealkiller

Enthusiast

Join Date: Oct 2005

Location: Windsor CO

Posts: 936

Originally Posted by 02ponypackage

first off u drive a V6 ^...2nd u wouldnt know shit about launching...3rd Ive seen my share of 10sec cobra on IRS with no problems...its called suspension upgrades and driving...read up on it sometime...also if 23 is the cheapest you've seen then that may be true...but lets leave it up to the guy who sees them on the road here all the time...and see the prices people sell them for...also about that below 10s....did u even know Cobras have Independent Rear Suspension ? or do you know what it is ? .......and trust me cars running 9s and lower have more then a Fully built rear end...and they also would have another daily driver since 9 second daily driven and well maintained on the street is something u dont hear about...c'mon below 10s ? no1 is talking about 9 second cars...internet smack just for taking the time to type such non sense

1st of all I drive a 97 GT

2nd of all I do know how to launch very well I've kept up with LT1 T/A's from a dig bone stock.... for about 100-150 ft depending on the day.

3rd I have also seen cobras run 9's with the IRS as well but that is with an amount of money that you could probably get the same times out of the Mach 1 since it already is set back by the IRS. That is my point.
4th I know of plenty of foxes that run 9's and are street legal and driven there, definitely not every day but their still driven.
5th you dont know what the hell are you talking about, I know plenty about an IRS do you want me to teach you about it cuz your the one that is typing the non sense about me.......... So next time take a look at what I actually have before you try and talk shit and there wont be no shit....