weight reduction
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > V6 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old June 9th, 2007, 10:58 PM   #1
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2000 V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,670
ByPopularDemand is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ByPopularDemand Send a message via MSN to ByPopularDemand
Default

weight reduction


So I've been thinking...I noticed when I have a passenger that's a girl the car doesn't seem to lag at all from the extra weight of 120 pounds or less (the heaviest girl that's been it there) but when I have a friend who weight 200-260ish or more for some of them it seems waaaaaay slower...so I was wondering how much weight would I have to lose to get a gain in speed
__________________
2000 V6 vert
Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive pulley(r.i.p), SCT tune, 8.8 rear and 4.10 gears.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old June 9th, 2007, 11:07 PM   #2
Banned
 
2007 Mustang
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 898
Kuro has a spectacular aura aboutKuro has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

i think its like, every 100pounds you lose, you gain a sec on your 1/4 time. im probly wrong though.
__________________
[url]www.ctxracing.com[/url]
[url]www.tandlmedia.com[/url]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2007, 11:12 PM   #3
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2000 V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,670
ByPopularDemand is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ByPopularDemand Send a message via MSN to ByPopularDemand
Default

No 100 pounds isn't a full second difference, but I know there is some ratio to it cause I've felt it
__________________
2000 V6 vert
Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive pulley(r.i.p), SCT tune, 8.8 rear and 4.10 gears.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2007, 11:17 PM   #4
Cigar Assassin
 
GTsetGO's Avatar
 
2004 Mustang GT
12.88 @ 112
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: A Galaxy Far, Far Away
Posts: 13,888
GTsetGO has much to be proud ofGTsetGO has much to be proud ofGTsetGO has much to be proud ofGTsetGO has much to be proud ofGTsetGO has much to be proud ofGTsetGO has much to be proud ofGTsetGO has much to be proud ofGTsetGO has much to be proud ofGTsetGO has much to be proud of
iTrader: 10 reviews
Send a message via AIM to GTsetGO Send a message via MSN to GTsetGO Send a message via Yahoo to GTsetGO
Default

it's more around 1/10th of a second for every 100 lbs. but someone correct me if I am wrong
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2007, 12:30 AM   #5
MM Fanatic
 
02ponypackage's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central FL
Posts: 3,420
02ponypackage is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

yeah its .1 for every 100 lbs. shit if it was 1 full second i would just lost weight myself...at least 50 lbs ....i cant look starving at 100......but its .1 so if u took the spare out with the jack...took ur seats out and the motor in the drivers side and put some Kirkeys or something light weight...and a rear seat delete out of plexi glass and carpet...you'll have a lot of weight gone
__________________
just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood
  Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2007, 12:35 AM   #6
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2000 V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,670
ByPopularDemand is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ByPopularDemand Send a message via MSN to ByPopularDemand
Default

My car is fat as fuck
__________________
2000 V6 vert
Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive pulley(r.i.p), SCT tune, 8.8 rear and 4.10 gears.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2007, 01:03 AM   #7
MM Fanatic
 
02ponypackage's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central FL
Posts: 3,420
02ponypackage is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

i could care less...my shits gona be boosting
__________________
just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood
  Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2007, 01:35 AM   #8
¡ʇsnq ɹo uʍop ǝpısdn
 
Onemanzu's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Looking for free hand jobs in poland springs nebraska... silly gooses
Posts: 12,514
Blog Entries: 1
Onemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

boost... ha try boasting a fat chick in the front seat!!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2007, 02:14 AM   #9
Banned
 
2007 Mustang
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 898
Kuro has a spectacular aura aboutKuro has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

sorry, i didnt know. the best thing to do for weight reduction is drill and chamfer the frame. it actually makes the frame stronger because stress moves in a line, and when it comes to a chamfered hole it cannot go through.
__________________
[url]www.ctxracing.com[/url]
[url]www.tandlmedia.com[/url]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2007, 03:49 AM   #10
Banned
 
00 V6 & 09 GT
13.37@104.4mph--BONE stock GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 15,859
itschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to itschristorres8
Default

like gtsetgo said
the ratio IS ABOUT .1 of a second for every 100lbs

depending on the setup and where the weight is taken out you could see more or less
for example
if you could take off 100lbs from the front of the car i'd say you'd see more then .1 of a gain
less weight to push and better traction cause the weight is being evened out a little more.
but 100lbs from rear seat removal, ligther trunk, taking out the spare tire and jack and other weight taken out in only the back i'd say you'd only see the .1 or less


but for that car weight reduction items
no carpet
carbon fiber or light trunk
light weight rims
lose the jack and spare tire
rear seat delete
light weight racing seats up front
take off the front sway bar
remove a/c and air bags
switch from power windows to roll up windows
take out the heater as well
take out speakers
aluminum driveshaft
aluminum block


all that might be worth .5-.7 of a second...

no radio
no air conditioning,
uncomfortable seats
get a flat n your fucked
only one friend in the car
if you crash your face is gonna get pretty fucked up along with your body

when my car was stock i knew a guy with a b16 in a hatch.. had nothing in the inside of the car but his drivers seat and a basket for someone to sit on....
still beat him stock...
weight reductions are i'd say better for track cars...
idk about you but in florida i need my A/c
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Acmillr loves me
  Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2007, 11:49 AM   #11
MM Fanatic
 
02ponypackage's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central FL
Posts: 3,420
02ponypackage is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Onemanzu
boost... ha try boasting a fat chick in the front seat!!

try with a supercharger doesnt matter
__________________
just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood
  Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2007, 11:51 AM   #12
MM Fanatic
 
02ponypackage's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central FL
Posts: 3,420
02ponypackage is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

i live in FL and i dont see the point in AC unless u wanna save gas mileage when driving on I4 and u dont have the windows down....as fir weight reduction...ive seen a 240+ lb guy driving a bone stock completely gutted 96-98 Civic non Si at the track and was running high 14s
__________________
just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood
  Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2007, 12:27 AM   #13
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2000 V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,670
ByPopularDemand is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ByPopularDemand Send a message via MSN to ByPopularDemand
Default

Completely gutted would be pushing it...I was thinking scrap the rear seats, get some light weight racing seats, light weight rims(if I find some I like) and maybe carbon fiber hood and deck lid...btw is there anything else light that will be easier to have painted
__________________
2000 V6 vert
Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive pulley(r.i.p), SCT tune, 8.8 rear and 4.10 gears.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2007, 12:31 AM   #14
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2000 V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,670
ByPopularDemand is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ByPopularDemand Send a message via MSN to ByPopularDemand
Default

Completely gutted would be pushing it...I was thinking scrap the rear seats, get some light weight racing seats, light weight rims(if I find some I like) and maybe carbon fiber hood and deck lid...btw is there anything else light that will be easier to have painted
__________________
2000 V6 vert
Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive pulley(r.i.p), SCT tune, 8.8 rear and 4.10 gears.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 12th, 2007, 09:45 PM   #15
Newbie
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
BateGoiko is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

also get a lightweight battery like Odyssey or braille($$$). you lose 20lbs right there.

lightweight brake rotors. removes quite a bit of unsprung weight.
get light flywheel, carbon fiber driveshaft ($$$)

the more rotational mass you remove the less power is lost through the drivetrain, so the gains are not only from the lighter car, but from more efficient drivetrain

one thing i like about weight reduction is that it can also be practical --- gas mileage is improved, car handles better and gets a bit faster.


hey Torres, who offers aluminum blocks for the 3.8? I've never seen one.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 13th, 2007, 12:48 AM   #16
¡ʇsnq ɹo uʍop ǝpısdn
 
Onemanzu's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Looking for free hand jobs in poland springs nebraska... silly gooses
Posts: 12,514
Blog Entries: 1
Onemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to beholdOnemanzu is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

i would love an aluminum block... that would kick so much ass... i would sell my car for one... kinda contradicting ... but hell who cares... i could get a shelled car and drop it in... with a t-56 and an 8.8 ... that would fuckin dominate! after a twin turbo that is
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old June 13th, 2007, 01:46 AM   #17
Banned
 
00 V6 & 09 GT
13.37@104.4mph--BONE stock GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 15,859
itschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to itschristorres8
Default

talk to andy actually.. i tlk to him yesterday...
his car only weighs 2,700lbs now!!!!
thats a huge weight reduction
but hes got his car ready for an all out drag car
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Acmillr loves me
  Reply With Quote
Old June 13th, 2007, 01:48 AM   #18
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2000 V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,670
ByPopularDemand is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ByPopularDemand Send a message via MSN to ByPopularDemand
Default

Wow 2700lb car would kick ass
__________________
2000 V6 vert
Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive pulley(r.i.p), SCT tune, 8.8 rear and 4.10 gears.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 13th, 2007, 01:52 AM   #19
Banned
 
00 V6 & 09 GT
13.37@104.4mph--BONE stock GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 15,859
itschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to itschristorres8
Default

hell yea...he told me a general idea of what he's doing...he's got a 4.2L coming in soon...4.2L with a turbo on a 2,700lb car...8.8 rear with a new tranny...
and he'll know what he's doing with his turbo set up...i see that car being the fastest v6 mustang known yet...
fastest is the 9.9 single port 95 v6 with a single turbo running 30psi
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Acmillr loves me
  Reply With Quote
Old June 13th, 2007, 02:03 AM   #20
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2000 V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,670
ByPopularDemand is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ByPopularDemand Send a message via MSN to ByPopularDemand
Default

That's gonna be insane, 2700 lbs and buncha power...that sounds like potential of being the fastest
__________________
2000 V6 vert
Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive pulley(r.i.p), SCT tune, 8.8 rear and 4.10 gears.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: weight reduction
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
weight reduction mustang2517 99-04 24 October 4th, 2007 03:28 PM
Weight reduction ByPopularDemand V6 Mustangs 36 April 12th, 2007 12:08 AM
weight Reduction Standardrift 2005 - 2010 6 March 4th, 2007 11:46 PM
Weight Reduction GTSilver 99-04 6 September 25th, 2006 12:59 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.