Base Line V6 dyno check finished

Obliv · July 2nd, 2007, 07:52 PM

http://www.mustang50magazine.com/tec...st/octane.html

Straight out of MM&FF.

So, yeah...186rwhp. Minus 3hp from them doing it in 3rd gear. So 183hp!

So much h8 for the S197 v6s

They really are amazing cars, too.

02ponypackage · July 2nd, 2007, 08:01 PM

thats on a Dyno Jet....dyno jets ahve anyhere between 10-15% higher numbers over a Mustang Dyne...thats why a lot of shops and products are done and tested on dyno jets....and when done on a Mustang Dyne it usually states it because numbers are lower and they dont want people to be discouraged...since on a dyno jet they would like the numbers they see there which may be higher but put the same car on a DJ and a MD make different numbers and run the same 1/4

Obliv · July 2nd, 2007, 08:12 PM

Oh alright. Which dyno is used more often? I didnt know that there was a drastic difference in the two. Kinda weird that theres 2 different ways to calculate the same thing, and come up with 2 different answers

HMUSN · July 2nd, 2007, 08:14 PM

it's a known fact that a dynojet will produce anywhere from 8-12 % higher numbers than a mustang dyno.

02ponypackage · July 2nd, 2007, 08:16 PM

Dyno Jets are used more...but if u want on the money and ok with lower numbers Mustang Dyne...because my car will dyno about 215 rwhp on a DJ and its only 196rwhp on a MD right now...and even asking Justin Starkey and estimate of me dynoing he said the same ...about 210-215...pending weather conditions that day some 5hp give and take

Obliv · July 2nd, 2007, 08:56 PM

Alright, so a mustang dyno is more accurate. Why does anyone use a dynojet then? Seems very redundant, and almost misleading. Is there any benefits to using one over another? One used for tuning, other just for numbers etc?

02ponypackage · July 2nd, 2007, 09:19 PM

like crank HP bigger numbers look nice on paper

itschristorres8 · July 3rd, 2007, 01:16 AM

either way the guy who made this post is full of shit

bottom line
10+- rwhp isnt much to brag about

ByPopularDemand · July 3rd, 2007, 03:30 AM

That is awesome!!! My car can beat stock s197's with 203/256 to the wheels!!! I must be pushing like edge GT numbers lol

July 2nd, 2007, 08:01 PM	#42
02ponypackage MM Fanatic Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Central FL Posts: 3,405 iTrader: 0 reviews	thats on a Dyno Jet....dyno jets ahve anyhere between 10-15% higher numbers over a Mustang Dyne...thats why a lot of shops and products are done and tested on dyno jets....and when done on a Mustang Dyne it usually states it because numbers are lower and they dont want people to be discouraged...since on a dyno jet they would like the numbers they see there which may be higher but put the same car on a DJ and a MD make different numbers and run the same 1/4 __________________ just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood

July 2nd, 2007, 08:14 PM	#44
HMUSN Doc 1986 SVO 48.47@ 12.58 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 37,050 iTrader: 11 reviews	it's a known fact that a dynojet will produce anywhere from 8-12 % higher numbers than a mustang dyno. __________________

July 2nd, 2007, 08:16 PM	#45
02ponypackage MM Fanatic Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Central FL Posts: 3,405 iTrader: 0 reviews	Dyno Jets are used more...but if u want on the money and ok with lower numbers Mustang Dyne...because my car will dyno about 215 rwhp on a DJ and its only 196rwhp on a MD right now...and even asking Justin Starkey and estimate of me dynoing he said the same ...about 210-215...pending weather conditions that day some 5hp give and take __________________ just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood

July 2nd, 2007, 09:19 PM	#47
02ponypackage MM Fanatic Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Central FL Posts: 3,405 iTrader: 0 reviews	like crank HP bigger numbers look nice on paper __________________ just a V6 with a bad belt slip under the hood

July 3rd, 2007, 01:16 AM	#48
itschristorres8 Banned 00 V6 & 09 GT 13.37@104.4mph--BONE stock GT Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: south florida Posts: 15,806 iTrader: 2 reviews	either way the guy who made this post is full of shit bottom line 10+- rwhp isnt much to brag about __________________ [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me

July 2nd, 2007, 07:52 PM	#41
Obliv Regular Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 50 iTrader: 0 reviews	http://www.mustang50magazine.com/tec...st/octane.html Straight out of MM&FF. So, yeah...186rwhp. Minus 3hp from them doing it in 3rd gear. So 183hp! So much h8 for the S197 v6s They really are amazing cars, too.

July 2nd, 2007, 08:12 PM	#43
Obliv Regular Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 50 iTrader: 0 reviews	Oh alright. Which dyno is used more often? I didnt know that there was a drastic difference in the two. Kinda weird that theres 2 different ways to calculate the same thing, and come up with 2 different answers

July 2nd, 2007, 08:56 PM	#46
Obliv Regular Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 50 iTrader: 0 reviews	Alright, so a mustang dyno is more accurate. Why does anyone use a dynojet then? Seems very redundant, and almost misleading. Is there any benefits to using one over another? One used for tuning, other just for numbers etc?

July 3rd, 2007, 03:30 AM	#49
ByPopularDemand Hardcore Enthusiast 2000 V6 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Albuquerque Posts: 2,666 iTrader: 0 reviews	That is awesome!!! My car can beat stock s197's with 203/256 to the wheels!!! I must be pushing like edge GT numbers lol __________________ 2000 V6 vert Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive pulley(r.i.p), SCT tune, 8.8 rear and 4.10 gears.

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Ford Mustang Forum Advertisement

Threads Similar to: Base Line V6 dyno check finished
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Cloning A GT 500 From A V6 Base	v6hornet	2005 - 2010	17	December 5th, 2007 11:42 AM
BaseLine Dyno Check	05MUSTANG4.0	The Clubhouse	13	June 21st, 2007 06:40 PM
Removing Antenna Base?	Vision.Pro	Visual	4	May 6th, 2007 12:06 PM
shaker base assembly	musman	Classic Mustangs	0	March 11th, 2007 11:53 AM
Possible to install a 04 Cobra engine in a 99 base?	HypeTelecon	Modular Mustangs	3	December 19th, 2006 08:11 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs : Ford Mustang Forums - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.