![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Pipe diameter for true dual in the V6 Mustangs Forum. Hello Vsixers. I have a question that I need some feedback on. I am planning ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
|
Pipe diameter for true dual |
|
|
#2 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2001 V6 / 2004 Mach 1
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Waterville, Oh
Posts: 1,118
|
2.5" is perfect
__________________
![]() under way#13 in coolest MM members www.dirtydirtyracing.com |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2000 Mustang V6 n proud
13.1@107mph 2.1-60'
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 13,950
|
2.25 would be perfect unless your planning on getting a s/c really soon
__________________
![]() 390rwhp V6 mustang stock bottom end |
|
|
#4 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2000 Mustang V6
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,579
|
2.5 its ok but 2.25 if u thinking on n/a we depend on backpressure so dont use 2.5 unless ur going to get a power adder in the future
i think 2.5 also gives some nice sound compare to 2.25 idk y i think like that tho
__________________
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2000 Mustang V6 n proud
13.1@107mph 2.1-60'
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 13,950
|
i did not feel any difference with 2.25 pipes
2.5 will lose some low end back pressure which means....losing power off the line
__________________
![]() 390rwhp V6 mustang stock bottom end |
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,400
|
I think the bigger pipes give me a bit more between 80-110 mph. Thats where I notice the difference. When Im racing down the e-way, I can get away from some "faster" cars when at that speed ( or maybe the other cars are pussies and they dont try to keep up
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeQLUyYg3EA ^^^^Ok... for a 232^^^^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ah1EbIOdAZE PhotoClub Co-Founder K&N FIPK Dual Flowmasters Xcal III
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Dodge, Iowa
Posts: 2,475
|
6" would b perfect!!!
LOLOL just kidding... 2.25 or 2.5 |
|
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1996 Mustang V6
still pushing
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: tied up in HMUSN's trunk
Posts: 2,717
|
i have 2.25 and i like it... 2.5 if you are gonna go with forced induction
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
|
Thanks guys....I think I will end up going with the 2.5. I DO plan putting a ProCharger on in the future so I guess to save on cost Ill deal with the low end loss for while, If I can feel any at all. Thanks for the replies.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Pipe diameter for true dual
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| True Dual exhaust | N29468 | V6 Mustangs | 22 | July 3rd, 2008 09:46 PM |
| "95 GT H-pipe diameter? | MWWarlord | Exhaust | 3 | October 7th, 2007 02:58 AM |
| True Dual or H-pipe | StangFreak4 | Exhaust | 8 | June 13th, 2007 10:42 PM |
| True Dual Exhast | stinglikeastang | 99-04 | 1 | June 10th, 2007 04:29 PM |
| True Dual Exhaust | Murderjetz | Exhaust | 7 | March 22nd, 2007 11:45 AM |