V6 Vs. 70'

soccerboy08 · November 23rd, 2007, 10:30 PM

I have a 2002 mustang sixer with manual transmission. i just have an offroad x pipe with dual flowmast exhaust. I have a cold air intake and new spark plugs. i just got new bfgoodrich sport tires.thats it. i am racing 1970 mustang fastback. 302 v8 ROUSH racing pistons and heads and 750 cfm carb. automatic. who do you think will win on the strip???

Youngin · November 23rd, 2007, 10:36 PM

i am guessing he is . im sorry but your mods just dont add a whole lot HP

Avaric3 · November 23rd, 2007, 10:39 PM

if you bet any money on the race id just pay him now

soccerboy08 · November 23rd, 2007, 10:41 PM

ok thanks guys

i figured but wanted to make sure

Avaric3 · November 23rd, 2007, 10:59 PM

tell him that id give my left nut for his 70 fastback gt

ByPopularDemand · November 24th, 2007, 01:37 AM

Was it a boss model? if so your toast...if it was the 220 hp version then you may not do so bad...old cars are HEAVY

MWWarlord · November 24th, 2007, 01:50 AM

Yeah man your mods make you sound good but don't add much HP. He has more performance oriented mods on a car that is probably faster to begin with. You're toast!

tjames · November 24th, 2007, 03:54 AM

like they said man, you lose

Hourofpain · November 24th, 2007, 12:09 PM

hes got you

just bend over and put the lube on yourself

itll hurt less

Juggalo_X · November 24th, 2007, 12:28 PM

Originally Posted by ByPopularDemand

Was it a boss model? if so your toast...if it was the 220 hp version then you may not do so bad...old cars are HEAVY

ByPopularDemand · November 24th, 2007, 12:51 PM

I dunno if I should be offended, or glad someone agrees lol

Juggalo_X · November 24th, 2007, 12:54 PM

little of A, little of B

Vinyl66 · November 24th, 2007, 01:51 PM

Originally Posted by ByPopularDemand

Was it a boss model? if so your toast...if it was the 220 hp version then you may not do so bad...old cars are HEAVY

i could be wrong but aren't both cars around 3100lbs? older mustangs aren't heavy. my 66 is 2750 dry weight

myPONYisHARD · November 24th, 2007, 03:30 PM

older cars really arnt that heavy there just big and goofy

WLJohnson05 · November 24th, 2007, 03:59 PM

hey question along these lines too...what about 04 v6 (exhaust, cai, tune) vs. a 68 gt stock...?

ByPopularDemand · November 24th, 2007, 04:45 PM

A 289 you should beat, a 302 will be close and the bigger motors will get you

ByPopularDemand · November 24th, 2007, 04:47 PM

Most older cars are land yachts lol...and a 2750 lb stang? youd think they would move better

BWAL09 · November 24th, 2007, 04:47 PM

the performance difference in a 302 and a 289 is minimal

ByPopularDemand · November 24th, 2007, 04:50 PM

I wouldnt call a 35 hp difference minimal...

BWAL09 · November 24th, 2007, 04:51 PM

Originally Posted by ByPopularDemand

I wouldnt call a 35 hp difference minimal...

35hp? damn, i didn't realize it was that much.. i retract my statement then lol

November 23rd, 2007, 10:30 PM	#1
soccerboy08 Regular 2002 Ford Mustang V6 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Greenville, South Carolina Posts: 126	V6 Vs. 70' I have a 2002 mustang sixer with manual transmission. i just have an offroad x pipe with dual flowmast exhaust. I have a cold air intake and new spark plugs. i just got new bfgoodrich sport tires.thats it. i am racing 1970 mustang fastback. 302 v8 ROUSH racing pistons and heads and 750 cfm carb. automatic. who do you think will win on the strip???

November 23rd, 2007, 10:36 PM	#2
Youngin MM Fanatic 2007 Mustang v6 7.86 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Santa Monica Posts: 3,069	i am guessing he is . im sorry but your mods just dont add a whole lot HP __________________ Black Mustang Organization Official Member #1 ^ HighLight REtarD HATERS CLUB CO-FOUNDER MEMBER #1 [Black Branch Founder] Looking For V6 Hip Hop Artists

November 23rd, 2007, 10:39 PM	#3
Avaric3 Hardcore Enthusiast 1999 Ford Mustang the world may never know Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: M-Pan, NJ Posts: 2,120	if you bet any money on the race id just pay him now __________________ COMING SOON- FRPP Aluminum Drivshaft, VAP Windstar Upper Kit, VAP 1/2" Intake Spacer, MMR Front Coil-Overs, Eibach Sportline Rear Springs

November 23rd, 2007, 10:59 PM	#5
Avaric3 Hardcore Enthusiast 1999 Ford Mustang the world may never know Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: M-Pan, NJ Posts: 2,120	tell him that id give my left nut for his 70 fastback gt __________________ COMING SOON- FRPP Aluminum Drivshaft, VAP Windstar Upper Kit, VAP 1/2" Intake Spacer, MMR Front Coil-Overs, Eibach Sportline Rear Springs

November 24th, 2007, 01:37 AM	#6
ByPopularDemand Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Albuquerque Posts: 2,254	Was it a boss model? if so your toast...if it was the 220 hp version then you may not do so bad...old cars are HEAVY __________________ 2000 V6 Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive crank pulley, SCT tune, and a buncha cosmetic mods

November 23rd, 2007, 10:41 PM	#4
soccerboy08 Regular 2002 Ford Mustang V6 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Greenville, South Carolina Posts: 126	ok thanks guys i figured but wanted to make sure

November 24th, 2007, 01:50 AM	#7
MWWarlord Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Fredericksburg, VA Posts: 1,303	Yeah man your mods make you sound good but don't add much HP. He has more performance oriented mods on a car that is probably faster to begin with. You're toast! __________________ MWWarlord 1995 Mustang convertible check out my garage for pics and a complete list of mods. http://www.tricktuners.com

November 24th, 2007, 12:09 PM	#9
Hourofpain Hardcore Enthusiast 2003 Mustang V6 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Beach Posts: 1,180	hes got you just bend over and put the lube on yourself itll hurt less __________________

November 24th, 2007, 12:51 PM	#11
ByPopularDemand Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Albuquerque Posts: 2,254	I dunno if I should be offended, or glad someone agrees lol __________________ 2000 V6 Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive crank pulley, SCT tune, and a buncha cosmetic mods

November 24th, 2007, 03:30 PM	#14
myPONYisHARD Regular Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: weston,fl Posts: 272	older cars really arnt that heavy there just big and goofy __________________ Boost in the works

November 24th, 2007, 04:45 PM	#16
ByPopularDemand Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Albuquerque Posts: 2,254	A 289 you should beat, a 302 will be close and the bigger motors will get you __________________ 2000 V6 Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive crank pulley, SCT tune, and a buncha cosmetic mods

November 24th, 2007, 04:47 PM	#17
ByPopularDemand Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Albuquerque Posts: 2,254	Most older cars are land yachts lol...and a 2750 lb stang? youd think they would move better __________________ 2000 V6 Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive crank pulley, SCT tune, and a buncha cosmetic mods

November 24th, 2007, 04:50 PM	#19
ByPopularDemand Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Albuquerque Posts: 2,254	I wouldnt call a 35 hp difference minimal... __________________ 2000 V6 Mac LT headers, Mac O/R H-pipe, Mac CAI, ASP 25% underdrive crank pulley, SCT tune, and a buncha cosmetic mods

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08 PM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.