cam the 2004

March 3rd, 2008, 10:13 AM	#1
1BADSTANG Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: long island Posts: 1,512	cam the 2004 I was going to do a full hci for my buddys 2004 mustang 6, but i said to myself fuck it, hes got tons of bolt ons, its not slow. I just want it to have a deeper growl, any good cams out there for a strichtly street car and not wasting any driveability? I want a cam that is not VERY agressive but has a nice bark to it. But wont decrease driveability. Are cam jobs hard to do on these puppies? how much rwhp should they do? Im really looking for the sound more than power, but hopefully it will squeeze another 10-15 rwtq and hp.. thanks __________________ 331s burn oil and have a bad piston to head ratio. http://www.StreetChallenge3D.com/sig...?referal=1BAD1 LOL @ THIS http://www.ihateyoujulia.com/?id=0a8...27aa2c6245e4c2

March 3rd, 2008, 10:24 AM

itschristorres8

SP00LIN V6

2000 Mustang V6

unknown @390

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: south florida

Posts: 14,619

Originally Posted by 1BADSTANG

I was going to do a full hci for my buddys 2004 mustang 6, but i said to myself fuck it, hes got tons of bolt ons, its not slow. I just want it to have a deeper growl, any good cams out there for a strichtly street car and not wasting any driveability? I want a cam that is not VERY agressive but has a nice bark to it. But wont decrease driveability. Are cam jobs hard to do on these puppies? how much rwhp should they do? Im really looking for the sound more than power, but hopefully it will squeeze another 10-15 rwtq and hp.. thanks

probably get about that much depending on the tune and cam you want
and between new and regrind
ported intakes and heads would really compliment the new air going in
but a cam alone is a good mod

i would deffinitly get a tune after it

they're not TOO hard
i can give you a quick run down on what you'll have to do if youd like
it will take a couple hours

__________________

437rwhp and 402rwtq through a V6 on a stock bottom end

March 3rd, 2008, 10:26 AM

1BADSTANG

Hardcore Enthusiast

Join Date: Sep 2007

Location: long island

Posts: 1,512

Originally Posted by itschristorres8

probably get about that much depending on the tune and cam you want
and between new and regrind
ported intakes and heads would really compliment the new air going in
but a cam alone is a good mod

i would deffinitly get a tune after it

they're not TOO hard
i can give you a quick run down on what you'll have to do if youd like
it will take a couple hours

Thats it? wow, yeah definitely your the man. would i even start it after i did it? i would get a dyno within the day and would not drive it. Sucker has long tubes, high flow h, dual flows, a nice cai, subframe connectors, it feels more powerful than my 88 gt did stock

__________________
331s burn oil and have a bad piston to head ratio.

http://www.StreetChallenge3D.com/sig...?referal=1BAD1

LOL @ THIS http://www.ihateyoujulia.com/?id=0a8...27aa2c6245e4c2

March 3rd, 2008, 10:29 AM	#4
justinsstang Enthusiast 1998 Mustang v6 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Poplar Bluff, Missouri Posts: 749	most 6's are faster than the fox bodies stock:X (but i got beat by car and a half lol) __________________ Red '98 Mustang. Custom Dual Exhaust w/ fabbed X pipe. CAI. 17in Black Rims w/ Aluminum Lip. Alpine Head Unit and Type-S speakers in doors and decklid. 600w Bridged BOSS amp to two 12" Audio Bahn Blue Flame Series Subs.

March 3rd, 2008, 10:30 AM	#5
justinsstang Enthusiast 1998 Mustang v6 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Poplar Bluff, Missouri Posts: 749	and sigh... i want a fox... my gf says no they're ugly and i'll hurt myself.. LOL __________________ Red '98 Mustang. Custom Dual Exhaust w/ fabbed X pipe. CAI. 17in Black Rims w/ Aluminum Lip. Alpine Head Unit and Type-S speakers in doors and decklid. 600w Bridged BOSS amp to two 12" Audio Bahn Blue Flame Series Subs.

March 3rd, 2008, 10:34 AM

graystang01

Hardcore Enthusiast

2001 V6 Mustang

eventually @ slow

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: middle of nowhere, Va

Posts: 1,291

i had a fox at one point... i wish i had kept it

__________________

EAGLE SCOUTS OR GTFO

Originally Posted by WLJohnson05

tomorrow i am gonna get another betta. i think ima name this one zip

Originally Posted by yojoe600

if u name it Zip then it will never die

Originally Posted by Arsenal

naw, if you name it zip, it will just sexually abuse all the other fish.

March 3rd, 2008, 10:34 AM	#7
flattusmaximus78 MM Fanatic 1993 5.ohhhh 14.47 at 96 mph Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Gatorland Posts: 3,035	I went and got a fox lol. I love it. I miss the 6. My fox is quicker though. I'm not saying it's fast, but I need tires, spinds first so it's quite hard to compare. Now I'm putting a cam in the 5.0. __________________ 302 h/c/i

March 3rd, 2008, 10:37 AM

96GTRagTop

Master of the Force

Millenium Falcon

"Just Living the Dream"

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: Zip's Bubble

Posts: 7,598

Originally Posted by justinsstang

most 6's are faster than the fox bodies stock:X (but i got beat by car and a half lol)

really?

a 2005 v6 which runs a 1/4 in about 16 seconds is faster then a car that runs the 1/4 with mid 14's? Really? Thats news to me. I guess Ford must be doing something right, you know, if they can build a car that can break the laws of physics....

whats next......interdimensional tears in time n space right?

__________________
MSO smokes pole

March 3rd, 2008, 10:40 AM

itschristorres8

SP00LIN V6

2000 Mustang V6

unknown @390

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: south florida

Posts: 14,619

Originally Posted by 96GTRagTop

really?

a 2005 v6 which runs a 1/4 in about 16 seconds is faster then a car that runs the 1/4 with mid 14's? Really? Thats news to me. I guess Ford must be doing something right, you know, if they can build a car that can break the laws of physics....

whats next......interdimensional tears in time n space right?

to bad that hit low 15s stock like your car does stock let alone a stock fox

__________________

437rwhp and 402rwtq through a V6 on a stock bottom end

March 3rd, 2008, 10:41 AM

#10

itschristorres8

SP00LIN V6

2000 Mustang V6

unknown @390

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: south florida

Posts: 14,619

Originally Posted by 1BADSTANG

Thats it? wow, yeah definitely your the man. would i even start it after i did it? i would get a dyno within the day and would not drive it. Sucker has long tubes, high flow h, dual flows, a nice cai, subframe connectors, it feels more powerful than my 88 gt did stock

yeah they're not bad

you can start it after you install it
depending on the cam you may run lean or rich
but a day will not hurt it unless you do something nuts with the cam

__________________

437rwhp and 402rwtq through a V6 on a stock bottom end

March 3rd, 2008, 10:44 AM	#11
96GTRagTop Master of the Force Millenium Falcon "Just Living the Dream" Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Zip's Bubble Posts: 7,598	ur telling me a 2005 V6 will do low 15's stock.... BS..... they lack the gearing, and the proper rear end. and a stock fox runs 14's bro...... 87-93 of course........ __________________ MSO smokes pole

March 3rd, 2008, 10:56 AM

#12

itschristorres8

SP00LIN V6

2000 Mustang V6

unknown @390

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: south florida

Posts: 14,619

Originally Posted by 96GTRagTop

ur telling me a 2005 V6 will do low 15's stock....

BS.....

they lack the gearing, and the proper rear end.

and a stock fox runs 14's bro...... 87-93 of course........

someone posted a chart from a forum of 15.3s from an AUTO!
15.4 has been done stock on a new edge mustang

dont make me pull slips and pwn you

__________________

437rwhp and 402rwtq through a V6 on a stock bottom end

March 3rd, 2008, 10:59 AM	#13
96GTRagTop Master of the Force Millenium Falcon "Just Living the Dream" Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Zip's Bubble Posts: 7,598	I won't believe it until i see the car go down the track myself and then visually inspect the car. Don't waste ur time with time slips someone else posted. __________________ MSO smokes pole

March 3rd, 2008, 10:59 AM

#14

AtlanticBlue99

The Nice Guy

1999 Ford Mustang V6

14.79 @ 92.15

Join Date: Aug 2005

Location: UGA

Posts: 8,251

Originally Posted by itschristorres8

someone posted a chart from a forum of 15.3s from an AUTO!
15.4 has been done stock on a new edge mustang

dont make me pull slips and pwn you

__________________
ModdedAutos
1999 Mustang V6
I used to list my mods here but stopped when I exceeded 255 characters.

http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic8_7.gif

March 3rd, 2008, 11:06 AM

#15

itschristorres8

SP00LIN V6

2000 Mustang V6

unknown @390

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: south florida

Posts: 14,619

Originally Posted by 96GTRagTop

I won't believe it until i see the car go down the track myself and then visually inspect the car.

Don't waste ur time with time slips someone else posted.

lol oh boy this is just funny dude
thats just i guess your way of showing you cant believe and are jelous
ITS HAPPEND!!!
plenty of times!
GET OVER IT
somone with bolt ons and drags i believe made a high 13 pass as well on 4.10s or 3.73s

a s197 V6 will run low 15s STOCK!!!
you cant believe it but its true
someone on this site ran 15.4 in the 1/4 stock -sn95 new edge
flattusmax knows him
then theres another dude on here with and 1/8th slip good for LOW 15s as well and its a NEW EDGE
let alone a more powerful s197

YOU WRONG. sorry deal with that fact
BS all you want just makes you look ignorant. makes 4.6 look bad AGAIN
and really just makes me see you as jelous that the car can do that stock
despite what you have and run your jelous that a V6 can run times your car did stock

you state you wont believe it til you visually see it and watch it run the track
well yea you know im not gonna bring you that so your ignorant ass will say that....lol
YOU lose
face it its been done

i guess drgnracin72 is full of it in my eyes. he says he runs a flat 12 n/a but ive never seen him make the pass or inspect that car!
wait Darrell too. his car doesnt low 9s! ive never seen it. nor have you!
BS THE HOLE SITE!

^your vision

__________________

437rwhp and 402rwtq through a V6 on a stock bottom end

March 3rd, 2008, 11:17 AM

#16

Blainestang

Regular

Join Date: Dec 2007

Location: Tampa, FL

Posts: 412

Originally Posted by justinsstang

most 6's are faster than the fox bodies stock:X (but i got beat by car and a half lol)

Some 6's are faster, stock... but MOST? No.

Originally Posted by 96GTRagTop

ur telling me a 2005 V6 will do low 15's stock....

BS.....

they lack the gearing, and the proper rear end.

and a stock fox runs 14's bro...... 87-93 of course........

Yes... they will. A stock Auto has gone 15.0. And that wasn't some random schmuck on the internet... Jaime (Sprout) from v6power.net did it in front of MANY witnesses at the V6 Challenge a couple years ago.

That being said, a well-maintained 5-speed Fox is still faster than that.

Originally Posted by itschristorres8

someone posted a chart from a forum of 15.3s from an AUTO!
15.4 has been done stock on a new edge mustang

dont make me pull slips and pwn you

My '00 5-speed V6 went 15.5@90 when it was, if anything, slower than stock. Oh, and that was with a crappy 2.331 60'. I've pulled 2.1's with near-stock power and the stock open rear since then. Assuming good driving and conditions, a stock 99-04 5-speed is capable of low 15's, for sure.

__________________
1993 2.3L Coupe [Motortopia] : Open-Track Project... 214k miles
2000 V6 (Black,5-speed) [Motortopia] : Heads/Cam (EXHAUST CLIP)
2001 Harley Davidson F-150

Acts 16:31

March 3rd, 2008, 01:10 PM

#17

itschristorres8

SP00LIN V6

2000 Mustang V6

unknown @390

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: south florida

Posts: 14,619

Originally Posted by Blainestang

Some 6's are faster, stock... but MOST? No.

Yes... they will. A stock Auto has gone 15.0. And that wasn't some random schmuck on the internet... Jaime (Sprout) from v6power.net did it in front of MANY witnesses at the V6 Challenge a couple years ago.

That being said, a well-maintained 5-speed Fox is still faster than that.

My '00 5-speed V6 went 15.5@90 when it was, if anything, slower than stock. Oh, and that was with a crappy 2.331 60'. I've pulled 2.1's with near-stock power and the stock open rear since then. Assuming good driving and conditions, a stock 99-04 5-speed is capable of low 15's, for sure.

thank you

__________________

437rwhp and 402rwtq through a V6 on a stock bottom end

March 3rd, 2008, 01:51 PM

#18

itschristorres8

SP00LIN V6

2000 Mustang V6

unknown @390

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: south florida

Posts: 14,619

Originally Posted by 96GTRagTop

really?

a 2005 v6 which runs a 1/4 in about 16 seconds is faster then a car that runs the 1/4 with mid 14's? Really? Thats news to me. I guess Ford must be doing something right, you know, if they can build a car that can break the laws of physics....

whats next......interdimensional tears in time n space right?

lol this statment has OWNED all over it

__________________

437rwhp and 402rwtq through a V6 on a stock bottom end

March 3rd, 2008, 02:33 PM	#19
96GTRagTop Master of the Force Millenium Falcon "Just Living the Dream" Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Zip's Bubble Posts: 7,598	ok, i did some reasearching and ur right, it can run mid 15's stock.....but thats with a better then average driver, so i concede to that. but u seem to fail and mis the point of what i was saying. a v6 mustang is not as fast as a 5.0 stock for stock. Big whoop i was off by a second, it still doesn't make the point i was trying to get across any less valid and about the stock new edge v6 running the same times as a npi gt. wrong. U gave me the best of the best times. U wanna play that way, I can name 2 members on this site that ran 14.8 and a 14.7 on a completely stock car..... one of them may have had a filer... So u /fail on that note and i'm jealous, ur so right there chris. U may have turned over a new leaf, but ur head is still shoved so far up ur 6er worshiping fucking ass that u jump on anyone with the slighest bit of misinformation about the car. I was off by half a second. U failed to see the point of my post, and immediettly jumped down my throat. U don't know me from shit in the wall dude, and to go and call me jealous just goes to prove that. I bought my car because i like the style, not because of the motor. U think I'm jealous that all it took was an intake manifold, cams, and a set of gears to put me in the hi 13's? (Something of which requires full bolt on and gears/tlock for a 6er)Keep dreaming, and remember, when wiping, be sure to use medicated pads so u don't irritate ur neck __________________ MSO smokes pole Last edited by 96GTRagTop : March 3rd, 2008 at 02:41 PM.

March 3rd, 2008, 02:45 PM	#20