| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
'95 mustang sixer
*Shrugs*
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 214
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
F/I
So I wanted to make a poll but I'm an e-tard (and not the drug) so I can't find the little button plus I'm too lazy. So I wanted to know, for a 3.8L that's about to start getting money thrown at it, what do you guys think is a better direction. Now keep in mind I want this to be my daily driver, however gas mileage isn't a huge concern, but sustainability is. I don't want to constantly be under my hood replacing a broken this of shattered that (And yes I know that it is all inevitable with modding a stang).
But now the big question. In everyone's personal opinion, which offers better performance to power to daily drivability ratios? Supercharging or Turbo charging? Or twin Charging!? Lol. JK on the last part. I'm sure this thread has been posted before but I've been searching for an hour and found nothing but links back to Chris's statements here or there and SSSTangs statements of "GO VORTECH!" Haha. So don't gimme that stupid search smiley. I want my car to be fast. I want it to be a "WTF did that sixxer just own me! Haha. he's getting pulled over what a douche" kind of car. But I wanna know which direction is a better way to go. Oh, for shits and giggles throw in cost effective. Why the hell not. I can only get so much money on the corners late on a Thursday night. -poindexter-
__________________
![]() License Plate says it all.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
i would get a split port swap before any engine modifying or FI
example..10psi single port(turbo) made 260rwhp and 300+rwtq...split port on 10psi avg 330-350rwhp and 390rwtq Turbo is DEFFINITLY the way to go better on gas Faster cost $30-40 to get more boost or just at a button you can but i'd split port swap the thing before any FI.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2003 v6
340/373 - yay for belts
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: around
Posts: 1,764
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
+1
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
If you want crazy omg I just got owned buy a v6 fast: 4.3L stroker and a power adder is a must.
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle Random ESG fact: Had a prochamber on his v6 before it was popular. WTB: v6 BBK valve covers |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
'95 mustang sixer
*Shrugs*
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 214
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Haha. Remember, ssstang, I want streetability. I got a small block 305 that I'm turning into the beast. And yeah, Chris. I hear ya on the swap. That's where all the money is getting save for right now (Savings account now = split port swap and well basically money i'm sending Chris accoung). Haha.
-poindexter-
__________________
![]() License Plate says it all.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
S/C > power
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle Random ESG fact: Had a prochamber on his v6 before it was popular. WTB: v6 BBK valve covers |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
|
WTF? What is that analogy supposed to mean?
__________________
2006 Grand Prix GXP |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Doc
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
he says that while a supercharger makes more power than he has now a Turbo will make even more than the supercharger
__________________
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
|
Ah, I see.
__________________
2006 Grand Prix GXP |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
1998 mustang 3.8l v6
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: portsmouth ohio
Posts: 811
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
ummm not to jack the thread but how does a turbo make more power? and doesn't a turbo lag where as a SC doesn't?
__________________
![]() RACING because baseball,basketball, bowling,football, and golf only require one ball |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Ford Focus
slow as fuck
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: M-Pan, NJ
Posts: 2,556
![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
a centrifugal s/c will lag just about as much as a turbo
__________________
99 V6 Mustang-sold 02 Ford Focus-sold 98 Camaro Z/28-lid, catback |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Enthusiast
1998 mustang 3.8l v6
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: portsmouth ohio
Posts: 811
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yea but im talking like an m112 SC. THAT WOULD BE BETTER THAN A TURBO WOULDN'T IT?
__________________
![]() RACING because baseball,basketball, bowling,football, and golf only require one ball |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
MM's official Chevy guy
|
And the only s/c’s that don’t have lag are positive displacement ones. A good sized turbo will have about the same lag as a centrifugal s/c
__________________
![]() "Speak softly and carry a big stick" - Theodore Roosevelt "Any idiot can make a V8 fast, it takes a real idiot to make a fast V6". ![]() '02 Mustang N/A 4.3 stroker away for winter '72 Chevelle project car 454 coming '93 Bronco EFI 351W DD |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
off the line (if you can hook) yes, but soon SOON after that your going to get sucked up and pulled on hard.
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle Random ESG fact: Had a prochamber on his v6 before it was popular. WTB: v6 BBK valve covers |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
¡ʇsnq ɹo uʍop ǝpısdn
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Looking for free hand jobs in poland springs nebraska... silly gooses
Posts: 12,551
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
supercharge draws of the pulley system... it takes power to make power... you do some research you will find that say a vortech super charger only has like 80% efficiency ratios where as theoretically the turbocharger compared to a supercharger has 100% efficiency since it isn't taking power to make power
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
¡ʇsnq ɹo uʍop ǝpısdn
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Looking for free hand jobs in poland springs nebraska... silly gooses
Posts: 12,551
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Also something i doubt many of you know, you can design turbo charged vehicles to anti-lag, or spool while the engine isn't at peak spool point... kinda cool imo ... when you see cars on WRC that backfire when they down shift most of the time that is anti lag... this can be found on some hard core street applications where kids have taken it to there subbies and such because of its rarity and brag ability due to lack of common knowledge
__________________
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
Turbos still aren't 100% efficient...
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle Random ESG fact: Had a prochamber on his v6 before it was popular. WTB: v6 BBK valve covers |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
MM's official Chevy guy
|
__________________
![]() "Speak softly and carry a big stick" - Theodore Roosevelt "Any idiot can make a V8 fast, it takes a real idiot to make a fast V6". ![]() '02 Mustang N/A 4.3 stroker away for winter '72 Chevelle project car 454 coming '93 Bronco EFI 351W DD |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Banned
|
Turbo is the only thing i know of that you get something for nothing your not robbing ANY POWER. its really only helpful. doesnt hurt the car unless your pushing limits its the EASIEST way to make power and doesnt go away like nitrous
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |