| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Fl GO BULLS
Posts: 388
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Mods and rear
I know i posted this in the engine sections of the tech forum but i got no responses. I know the v6 section is active, full of inteligent v6's guys knowing their sh*t so i wanted to post it on here.
i have asked this before but everyone agrues what is best. So i will ask again. I have a 2004 v6 3.9L manual. It has like 33k miles. I want to keep it as a v6 because in the end will be cheaper than swap and all. As much as id love an N/a car, i dont think i can get the car at where i want it to be naturally aspirated. I dont want the stroker 4.2 or the f150 swapped 4.2 because thats too much money that i dont have, as a college student. Forced induction is an option but i would prefer a Supercharger, please dont post telling what i could do with a bottle. I know what it can do but i dont want to go that route. I think thats so cheap of power. I want power all the time and shouldnt have to refill it. I want to know the plus' and minus' of a supercharger vs turboes. I think i keep to my gut of the supercharger but you may persuade me to pick a turbo. I'm not looking at serious race car, i want to keep it as daily driver, but running high 12's low 13;s. I think thats like 300-350 rwhp. Also, my friend is selling me a 1999gt rear (8.8). For under $200. is that a good deal? Also do you know what gears are in them, ive heard 3.55, 3.53, and 3.08 whats the truth? Thanks for the help
__________________
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
they have 3.27s
theres no way you'll get 300rwhp with out forced induction, or a 4.2,4.3L stroker you can do: bolt ons ported heads ported intakes and or windstar intake new cam rocker arms and other valve train parts and with a tune see about 225rwhp or with a windstar and big valve heads possibly more. with suspension mods, aluminum drive shaft and flywheel you should be good for 13s for sure it would be 13s though and you could run a 75shot to get in the 12s or get a s/c or turbo kit. for a s/c you'll need about 11psi to run 300-320rwhp with a tune and exhaust for a s/c you could see it with 7.2psi and a tune. i probably could have made that power with 5.8psi and a tune for 350rwhp you can do 10-11.6psi for turbo for a s/c you'll need ported intakes(upper and lower) at least and 11psi to reach 350
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Fl GO BULLS
Posts: 388
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
OK so the easier way is the turbo or S/c. And reading the other 7 pages about the turbo vs. supercharger, im now leaning more towards a turbo. Yes, it is a little more money, but it will create much more power with less strain on the engine. Am i correct Torres? for a 3.9 what intercooled turboes are good for my car? IS there really a difference b/w 3.8 and 3.9's because the engines look identical?
Also, my friend is selling me a 1999gt rear (8.8). For under $200. is that a good deal? Torres did say they have the 3.27's on stock gt;s so i got that part
__________________
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Fl GO BULLS
Posts: 388
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
so what would i need to get do first before a turbo or supercharger. Or can i just throw one on and be good running at likle 11psi for the s/c and 9psi for the turbo? What about when i want to up them?
Also, torres, Do v6 Mustang's run better as single turboes or twin?
__________________
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 Mustang
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 506
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
a gt rear end for under 200 is a good deal and like chris said ported upper lower intake to be safe with the s/c
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang convertible
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,409
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
[quote=focus0frenzy1;1063274]
Also, my friend is selling me a 1999gt rear (8.8). For under $200. is that a good deal? Also do you know what gears are in them, ive heard 3.55, 3.53, and 3.08 whats the truth? You lucky ass SOB ![]() !!!! Do you have any idea how f***ing hard I have been trying to find an 8.8 for that kind of money. Plus you don't have to pay to have it shipped. Damn it I want an 8.8![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() !
__________________
MWWarlord 1995 Mustang convertible check out my garage for pics and a complete list of mods. http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Fl GO BULLS
Posts: 388
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
[quote=MWWarlord;1064367]
lol i wasnt even looking for it my friend offered it to me. Its off his friends gts. do you know how hard they are to install?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang convertible
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,409
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Not that hard(as long as you're not putting in new gears) if you have the right equipment. It pretty much bolts right up. The problem is having the right equipment. Rear ends are f***ing heavy.
__________________
MWWarlord 1995 Mustang convertible check out my garage for pics and a complete list of mods. http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
|
they're easy to install $200 is a STEAL
i wish i had that =/ 3.8 and 3.9=same me personally i prefer single turbo setup i plan on making 370rwhp at 11.6psi, tuned with ported upper and lower intake. 10psi is safe with a turbo before f/i if you have a manual get at least a stage2 clutch, if you have the cash aluminum flywheel and the 8.8 in there you'll also need an xcal2 to have some kind of tuning device 42lb fuel injectors or 39lb 310lph fuel pump and a better MAF that should have you good for 10psi turbo tuned or 11psi s/c tuned
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Mods and rear
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 8.8' Rear end vs. 9" rear end | jhooper | Classic Mustangs | 22 | April 25th, 2011 03:59 PM |
| Rear suspension mods | Wado | 2005 - 2010 | 5 | November 2nd, 2007 11:20 PM |
| Rear end upgrades/mods for 99-04 | Temecula_GT | 99-04 | 4 | June 16th, 2007 03:41 AM |
| 03 GT Need Help With Mods | Gtwrestler | Modular Mustangs | 17 | December 25th, 2006 12:37 PM |
| Rear Rotors and Rear Axle | rondaw3g0410 | 99-04 | 1 | September 6th, 2006 10:00 PM |