| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
|
Turbos And Gas Mileage
i know that turbo kits give you a little better gas mileage but when i start running the boost just how much gas mileage will i be loosing???
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang convertible
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,409
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I think that it might just be a typo, but turbo kits don't give you better gas mileage. I think how much MPG you lose depends on how much boost you're running. Talk to chris he should be able to give you some more exact numbers.
__________________
MWWarlord 1995 Mustang convertible check out my garage for pics and a complete list of mods. http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
|
actually cruizing in ur at low rpms (like 1800-2300) with a turbo can give u better gas mileage with a good tune, because since there is a higher oxygen density (bc of the turbo thats wat it does) there is more complete combustion of the gasoline, thus making it more fuel efficient...its not always the case taht u will notice a difference at all, but at low rpms it doesnt hurt ur mpg like a supercharger does
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MM Fanatic
KB'd GT
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
You will never see a gain in mpg with a turbo. They still cost about 5-15hp, but are WAY more efficient than blowers because basically when you are not using them, they don't cost near the power of a blower, and should retain near stock mpg. At part throttle the turbo is not doing anything.
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
|
i have the sts kit and its getting dyno tuned
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
Its not 100% , they still cost a small amount.
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle Random ESG fact: Had a prochamber on his v6 before it was popular. WTB: v6 BBK valve covers |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
|
i just heard with the sts kits u get a little better gas mileage like 2-4 gallons but when your running 9 or 10 psi i thought u get worse gas mileage??? i dont know i guess il find out next week
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Banned
|
if your worried about what you'll be losing you shouldnt install the turbo kit you would have to run the car at WOT i'd say for at least 10miles to be sure after you've filled up at a gas station...and you must leave the gas station at WOT and return at WOT......fill up and see what you filled up also you must do this w/o you turbo install the same exact way only probably 15miles thats the only accurate way to do it to get an exact answer... which is extremely bad for the car and within 8miles you'll probably do one of the following A.) Get arrest B.) Crash C.) Blow your motor D.) put un-need wear on the motor E.) blow out a tire if its not rated high enough you can probably hit welll well over 100mph within a mile....so within 8miles holding it at WOT your maxing out EVERYTHING on that car turbo rear tranny motor tires etc
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Banned
|
its just a bigger lag design with less power
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
¡ʇsnq ɹo uʍop ǝpısdn
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Looking for free hand jobs in poland springs nebraska... silly gooses
Posts: 12,551
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
you could find your fuels consumption rate in gallons per hour and do that as a measuring tool... and then with a little math... figure out your final MPG
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular
|
here we go with everyone just knocking the sts kit, the 05 v6 stang has 166 hp at the wheels with the sts kit i can have around 350 hp at the wheels how the hell is that not producing power???? anyway on horsepower tv they did an install on a vette and they said u get better fuel mileage, all im asking is if u lose a considerable amount of gas mileage when running around 9 psi
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Banned
|
350hp? have you seen they're site numbers...they're horrible vs powerhouse... all they're numbers are, GT's, GTO's Vettes you name it yes your going to worse mpg...bigger fuel injectors and fuel pump is for a reason...to flow more fuel if your worried then you shouldnt be going on boost its not just about producing power btw its about producing the most power efficiently STS does that about as good as a s/c does....which is sad for a turbo kit
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned
|
and plus was it you that said you made 360hp with your turbo?
and now your saying you'll make 350hp with 9 psi? STS website says you'll make 313rwhp and 326rwtq(tuned) WOW you'll make what i made on my 3.8L push rod with out a tune on 8.7psi! with a heavier car resulting in a slower car that turbo is only rated to 350hp...doesnt mean your making it with 9psi oh and on 5psi that kit made 250rwhp and 256rwtq i made 279rwhp and 293rwtq with just 5.8psi and no dyno tuning again a car with a 20hp higher rating then mine...making 30rwhp LESS with a tune vs no dyno tune..
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me Last edited by itschristorres8; May 24th, 2008 at 02:13 AM. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
|
the turbos rated to 500 hp and the 313 from the site was produced on a bone stock v6, i also have performance headers, and an 8.8 rear with t lock.
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
|
not to mention my system has an intercooler the one on the site does not
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang convertible
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,409
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
MWWarlord 1995 Mustang convertible check out my garage for pics and a complete list of mods. http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Regular
|
lol geez im not worried im just curious cause i heard that your gas will just drain out when u really get on the car.
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Banned
|
tell me how much hp the 8.8 rear gives youbuddy you have ALOT TO LEARN that systems ONLY bennifit is it being cooler...having intercooler doesnt help the boost drops that system will already have...not mention probably barely cool much.. next 8.8 rear end will do absolutly nothing as far as increasing numbers lol if anything it'll hurt from 7.5 wow headers....you probably have shorty headers..which are worth a WHOLE LOT ![]() lol at least i dont post numbers i dont have ![]() or claim to beat cars ive never raced or beaten ![]() or try to pwn someone that clearly knows more then me on something ![]() or think STS makes the better turbo kit ![]() ![]() at least i dont have to come on here and lie to look cool ![]() oh and at least i can say my 3.8L turbo makes more then a higher potiential 4.0L v6 doesnt with the STS turbo oh on more...at least i didnt have to fork over hundreds of $$ to have my kit installed because you cant get your hands dirty if i need to go on let me know
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
||
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang convertible
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,409
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
...![]() Go get him chris!
__________________
MWWarlord 1995 Mustang convertible check out my garage for pics and a complete list of mods. http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Turbos And Gas Mileage
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Gas mileage on a N/A 2.3? | acg | 2.3 Mustangs | 12 | June 1st, 2008 04:23 AM |
| better gas mileage??? | vfast | The Clubhouse | 17 | May 21st, 2008 11:32 PM |
| gas mileage | 1BADSTANG | V6 Mustangs | 6 | March 26th, 2008 11:08 AM |
| Gas mileage ? | MustangMatt | Modular Mustangs | 3 | December 18th, 2006 11:32 AM |
| Gas Mileage? | oldernewbie | General Tech | 19 | October 9th, 2006 03:37 PM |