![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing 4.10's or 4.30 in the V6 Mustangs Forum. Does anyone have 4.30's on a 2004 or alike v6 mustang? My buddy ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,501
|
4.10's or 4.30
__________________
331s burn oil and have a bad piston to head ratio. http://www.StreetChallenge3D.com/sig...?referal=1BAD1 LOL @ THIS http://www.ihateyoujulia.com/?id=0a8...27aa2c6245e4c2 |
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular
1996,mustang
around 5's 0-60
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: milan
Posts: 260
|
hell it's worth it you'll see not much but alittle accel.
but that depands what u got under the hood. it wouldn't really make a diff if its an auto but a manual would be better off. but the auto keeps the torque on the rear, but it wouldn't make a diff |
|
|
#3 | |
|
Moderator
2004 Mustang GT
8.876@80.013 1/8th
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 4,906
|
go with the 4.10s. 4.30 is a little much for street driving. I have 4.10s and absolutely love them.
__________________
![]()
Blue Mustang Society click it
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
1989 MUSTANG LX 5.0
16.17@86.21(bone stock on street tires)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 2,893
|
4.10 FTW 4.30's will be too much. I myself prefer 3.73 but to each his own.
__________________
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL HOOKERS....HUG A TOW TRUCK DRIVER! Donate to lxhatch@gmail.com |
|
|
#5 |
|
Enthusiast
2004 Mustang v6
Haven't tested
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, TN
Posts: 751
|
Since he's in an auto though 4.10s would be the best route, 3.73s in a stick...correct me if im wrong
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 V6 Mustang
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 2,039
|
Id stick with the 4.10s. Also, i dont think they even make 4.30s for the 7.5
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,501
|
well his car revvs slightly higher than 2k at 60mph. So i think thats 3.73;s. The tires chirp into second, but are fine in first, and this is no problem in a race, would traction become an issue with 4.10s?
__________________
331s burn oil and have a bad piston to head ratio. http://www.StreetChallenge3D.com/sig...?referal=1BAD1 LOL @ THIS http://www.ihateyoujulia.com/?id=0a8...27aa2c6245e4c2 |
|
|
#8 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 47
|
yeah that's 3.73. Traction shouldn't be a problem with 4.10s unless you have shit for tires.
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
1989 MUSTANG LX 5.0
16.17@86.21(bone stock on street tires)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 2,893
|
I didn't say anything about him getting 3.73's I said I MYSELF prefer 3.73's He can install 4.10's and have no problems at all.
__________________
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL HOOKERS....HUG A TOW TRUCK DRIVER! Donate to lxhatch@gmail.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 4.10's or 4.30
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 4.10's almost in! | matthundley | 99-04 | 57 | February 17th, 2008 10:52 AM |
| if i was to get 4:10's | thorpedo26 | 99-04 | 16 | February 4th, 2008 09:33 AM |
| 4.10's and FI | nutterbutter | 99-04 | 11 | January 25th, 2008 05:29 AM |
| 4.10's | blazor | V6 Mustangs | 17 | January 16th, 2008 09:09 AM |
| 4:10's for a V6 | 98mustang | V6 Mustangs | 50 | August 10th, 2007 12:00 PM |