00 v6 vs 94-98 gt

SleeperStang88 · September 1st, 2008, 12:02 PM

do you think that my 2000 auto v6 with cai, tb, t-lok and 3.73s can take a 94-98 gt??? the crank hp from the gt is only 205 if its a 5.0 and 215 if its a 4.6 and the v6 is 190, so im not too far off and the gears do make a difference ???/ wat do you think??

Dansby · September 1st, 2008, 12:09 PM

No.

SleeperStang88 · September 1st, 2008, 12:12 PM

how far behind am i?

Dansby · September 1st, 2008, 12:14 PM

Your at about 160-165 to the wheel, he's at about 180 I believe, and then you have the torque.

HMUSN · September 1st, 2008, 12:30 PM

yea your gonna lose..

they have like 60 ft pounds of tq on you

MIA · September 1st, 2008, 03:51 PM

Its all about tq.

HBK_2007 · September 1st, 2008, 04:25 PM

it the gt cant drive worth a shit, then maybe, but i doubt it

itschristorres8 · September 1st, 2008, 04:25 PM

yeah right i hung with a 97 GT stock vs me stock(sry K&N filter) from 20-115 side by side

he was auto im a 5spd

that also comes in to play though
if he's auto to you have a chance

SleeperStang88 · September 1st, 2008, 05:38 PM

yea i was hopin it would be sum wat close thanks to the gears they really helped with the start would a better torque converter do anything for improve my torque???

HMUSN · September 1st, 2008, 06:10 PM

ya gotta give him some hope don't ya chris?
lol

tell him he can hang with a cobra next

SleeperStang88 · September 1st, 2008, 06:17 PM

what can i take right now? n eclipse or camaro? rs of course

HMUSN · September 1st, 2008, 06:18 PM

the camaro is a drivers race with him having the edge and it depends on the eclipse to be honest.
some of them have turbos

SleeperStang88 · September 1st, 2008, 07:39 PM

the eclipses without the turbos, haha there is no way i have a chance with them the 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder oh and what about the 99-04 mustang gts? wat do i need to beat one of them, with out sc or turbo? or do i need that

HMUSN · September 1st, 2008, 07:42 PM

you need 70 HP and 63TQ to match a 99-04 GT.

the non turbo eclipse you shouldn't have an issue with

HBK_2007 · September 1st, 2008, 07:44 PM

juice......

Russ 3 ll PGT · September 1st, 2008, 07:48 PM

Let's get serious here. You have an Auto V6. You're not going to be able to beat a lot of cars on the road. Most newer grocery getters have more HP than you and would walk you pretty easily (i.e. Fusion, Camry, Accord six cylinders).

The only way to go fast in a ATX V6 is either a) Forced Induction, or b) Nitrous. I don't know much about Mustang ATXs, but I do know that most ATXs do not hold up well to boost/nitrous. Torque Converters and shift kits help that though.

Breakout · September 1st, 2008, 07:50 PM

turbo eclipses are decently fast. I had one that stayed about 2-3 cars behind me to 120 then got anihilated up to 150

SleeperStang88 · September 1st, 2008, 07:57 PM

what is ATX? and what do you drive Rus? just curious

HMUSN · September 1st, 2008, 07:58 PM

russ drives an SVT contour.

I assume atx means auto

SleeperStang88 · September 1st, 2008, 07:59 PM

im p&p my intake and heads with a cam this winter along with dual flowmasters, so i should be up around 220rwhp or so , by then i shouldnt have too much of a problem with most cars like a mustang or the "grocery getters"

September 1st, 2008, 12:02 PM	#1
SleeperStang88 Regular 2000 Mustang V6 need to run at track Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Michigan Posts: 355 iTrader: 2 reviews	00 v6 vs 94-98 gt do you think that my 2000 auto v6 with cai, tb, t-lok and 3.73s can take a 94-98 gt??? the crank hp from the gt is only 205 if its a 5.0 and 215 if its a 4.6 and the v6 is 190, so im not too far off and the gears do make a difference ???/ wat do you think??

September 1st, 2008, 12:30 PM	#5
HMUSN Doc 1986 SVO 48.47@ 12.58 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 37,050 iTrader: 11 reviews	yea your gonna lose.. they have like 60 ft pounds of tq on you __________________

September 1st, 2008, 03:51 PM	#6
MIA Regular 1995 3.8L Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Crystal Lake, IL Posts: 151 iTrader: 0 reviews	Its all about tq. __________________ WTS Stock rear performance speakers. 6"x8", works fine. Got new alpines :-) PM for Details/with offer.

September 1st, 2008, 04:25 PM	#7
HBK_2007 Genibus Nitito Canus 2009 Ford Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Wyoming Posts: 2,832 iTrader: 0 reviews	it the gt cant drive worth a shit, then maybe, but i doubt it __________________ Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, SLP Loudmouth

September 1st, 2008, 04:25 PM	#8
itschristorres8 Banned 00 V6 & 09 GT 13.37@104.4mph--BONE stock GT Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: south florida Posts: 15,806 iTrader: 2 reviews	yeah right i hung with a 97 GT stock vs me stock(sry K&N filter) from 20-115 side by side he was auto im a 5spd that also comes in to play though if he's auto to you have a chance __________________ [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me

September 1st, 2008, 12:09 PM	#2
Dansby Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Orange, Texas Posts: 2,285 iTrader: 1 reviews	No.

September 1st, 2008, 12:12 PM	#3
SleeperStang88 Regular 2000 Mustang V6 need to run at track Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Michigan Posts: 355 iTrader: 2 reviews	how far behind am i?

September 1st, 2008, 12:14 PM	#4
Dansby Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Orange, Texas Posts: 2,285 iTrader: 1 reviews	Your at about 160-165 to the wheel, he's at about 180 I believe, and then you have the torque.

September 1st, 2008, 05:38 PM	#9
SleeperStang88 Regular 2000 Mustang V6 need to run at track Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Michigan Posts: 355 iTrader: 2 reviews	yea i was hopin it would be sum wat close thanks to the gears they really helped with the start would a better torque converter do anything for improve my torque???

September 1st, 2008, 06:10 PM	#10
HMUSN Doc 1986 SVO 48.47@ 12.58 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 37,050 iTrader: 11 reviews	ya gotta give him some hope don't ya chris? lol tell him he can hang with a cobra next __________________

September 1st, 2008, 06:17 PM	#11
SleeperStang88 Regular 2000 Mustang V6 need to run at track Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Michigan Posts: 355 iTrader: 2 reviews	what can i take right now? n eclipse or camaro? rs of course

September 1st, 2008, 06:18 PM	#12
HMUSN Doc 1986 SVO 48.47@ 12.58 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 37,050 iTrader: 11 reviews	the camaro is a drivers race with him having the edge and it depends on the eclipse to be honest. some of them have turbos __________________

September 1st, 2008, 07:39 PM	#13
SleeperStang88 Regular 2000 Mustang V6 need to run at track Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Michigan Posts: 355 iTrader: 2 reviews	the eclipses without the turbos, haha there is no way i have a chance with them the 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder oh and what about the 99-04 mustang gts? wat do i need to beat one of them, with out sc or turbo? or do i need that

September 1st, 2008, 07:42 PM	#14
HMUSN Doc 1986 SVO 48.47@ 12.58 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 37,050 iTrader: 11 reviews	you need 70 HP and 63TQ to match a 99-04 GT. the non turbo eclipse you shouldn't have an issue with __________________

September 1st, 2008, 07:44 PM	#15
HBK_2007 Genibus Nitito Canus 2009 Ford Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Wyoming Posts: 2,832 iTrader: 0 reviews	juice...... __________________ Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, SLP Loudmouth

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Ford Mustang Forum Advertisement

September 1st, 2008, 07:48 PM	#16
Russ 3 ll PGT Newbie Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ohio Posts: 24 iTrader: 0 reviews	Let's get serious here. You have an Auto V6. You're not going to be able to beat a lot of cars on the road. Most newer grocery getters have more HP than you and would walk you pretty easily (i.e. Fusion, Camry, Accord six cylinders). The only way to go fast in a ATX V6 is either a) Forced Induction, or b) Nitrous. I don't know much about Mustang ATXs, but I do know that most ATXs do not hold up well to boost/nitrous. Torque Converters and shift kits help that though. __________________ 95 Ford Probe GT: SSAC headers, JJ resonated test pipe, custom dual exhaust, KLZE intake manifold, KLZE cams, lowered on Intrax. 95 Saleen Mustang: bolted, juiced, sold. 99 SVT Contour: AEM intake, Magnaflow cat-back - current ride.

September 1st, 2008, 07:50 PM	#17
Breakout Tree Fiddy Z 2006 Nissan 350Z Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Central Florida Posts: 2,018 iTrader: 0 reviews	turbo eclipses are decently fast. I had one that stayed about 2-3 cars behind me to 120 then got anihilated up to 150

September 1st, 2008, 07:57 PM	#18
SleeperStang88 Regular 2000 Mustang V6 need to run at track Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Michigan Posts: 355 iTrader: 2 reviews	what is ATX? and what do you drive Rus? just curious

September 1st, 2008, 07:58 PM	#19
HMUSN Doc 1986 SVO 48.47@ 12.58 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 37,050 iTrader: 11 reviews	russ drives an SVT contour. I assume atx means auto __________________

September 1st, 2008, 07:59 PM	#20
SleeperStang88 Regular 2000 Mustang V6 need to run at track Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Michigan Posts: 355 iTrader: 2 reviews	im p&p my intake and heads with a cam this winter along with dual flowmasters, so i should be up around 220rwhp or so , by then i shouldnt have too much of a problem with most cars like a mustang or the "grocery getters"

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs : Ford Mustang Forums - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.