![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Twin turbo versus supercharger in the V6 Mustangs Forum. One more thing, you all may be right. His tuner may be wrong. I may ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 85
|
One more thing, you all may be right. His tuner may be wrong. I may be closer to 180 rwhp. I'm done arguing this point. I was simply looking for advice on which would give me better HP gains the T/T or the S/C with Nitros.
Thanks, 00RoushV6 |
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#42 |
|
Regular
2004 Mustang V6 Vert.
328/419 @ 4000 rpms
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Delaware County, Pa
Posts: 318
|
Get a Twin turbo kit from TMA TURBO and call it done, you can also get a fully built tranny from Bc Automotive. nice quailty work and nice parts. im in the process of trying to get my car back together and im hoping for 500rwhp with a TMA Single turbo kit, Rpm-Mustangs 4.2 Motor with goodies, and a tranny from BC auto. you might want to upgrade to a 8.8 with 31 splines too.
Good Luck!
__________________
2004 Ford Mustang V6 Convertible Just hoping to make 500 RWHp ![]() Motor : Mik @ http://rpm-mustangs.com Turbo : Andy @ http://tmaturbo.com/ Intake : Chris @ http://www.crtperformance.webs.com/ Transmission : Darrin @ http://bc-automotive.com/ |
|
|
#43 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 146
|
I'll tell you up front. If your not a typical kid who gets bored with his car after like a couple years of driving it and you dont mind spending 10k to make your car like J's then the turbos are a good idea. If not, Put a blower on it and be done with it. Im Twin turboing my car and being realistic my crap wont be done for at least a couple years since im in college and my car isnt my entire life (no pun intended) but m112 that bitch gain a 100whp add other bolt-ons and traction and trans mods and i think you will be happy.
Or you could go single turbo and still make a 13's pass all day at the track if you get like a gt 35-40 turbo. Ask itschristorres, he will tell you all about it ![]() ![]() Also if your twin turboing it you have to know your shit. beacuse most performance shops or shops to begin with dont work with v6's so you have to do it your self or have some one build up your motor for you.
__________________
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Enthusiast
01 mustang
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: goose creek
Posts: 953
|
You should find everything out about your car before you begin modifying it,
you said you dont know if the previous owner did anything to it like cam work (i doubt they did, cuz otherwise probably wouldnt have sold it putting that kind of work into it) by finding all that out you dont accidently replace some performance part that was in there to begin with. oh, and i doubt stating your a 32 y/o isnt gonna gain you much insight, there are some amazing guys on here building a fantastic motor and they are only 18-20. all that aside, ABSOLUTELY GO TT!!! or!!! better yet!! buy a twin-turbo setup and then fed-ex one of them to me!!!
__________________
![]() LEAVE REP POINTS WHERE NEEDED!!! 2001 mustang V6 CAI,Tuner,Cobra Rims To come: UDP, T-lok, 3.73, full exhaust setup W/flowmaster 40s, aluminum driveshaft. Last edited by dgt_mustang : September 17th, 2008 at 06:50 PM. |
|
|
#45 |
|
Newbie
2006 Mustang V6
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 8
|
man you guys are harsh. there's no need to be a dick about all this stuff.
hey man go with a custom setup. go with a built bottom end and run a custom twin turbo setup. i plan on going with twin garrett gt35r ball bearing turbos but im looking for some serious power. with a proper tune and build a single gt35 r will get you around 400rwhp
__________________
2006 Mustang: V6, pony package, american thunder exhaust, HID headlight conversion |
|
|
#46 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 146
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
#47 | |||
|
Mod Johnson
2004 Mustang V6
322.8 rwhp
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 5,517
|
we have stickies at the top of this section that will give you a lot of information that can help you out, check em out...this one in particular: Look Here Before Asking About Mods
__________________
![]()
TURBO on 7.2psi CHECK OUT MY WEBSITE |
|||
|
|
#48 |
|
Regular
2004 Mustang V6 Vert.
328/419 @ 4000 rpms
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Delaware County, Pa
Posts: 318
|
Cost more then 15k Trust me i know, ive just done it but Single kit maybe i sholda made a build thread
__________________
2004 Ford Mustang V6 Convertible Just hoping to make 500 RWHp ![]() Motor : Mik @ http://rpm-mustangs.com Turbo : Andy @ http://tmaturbo.com/ Intake : Chris @ http://www.crtperformance.webs.com/ Transmission : Darrin @ http://bc-automotive.com/ |
|
|
#49 |
|
Enthusiast
2003 v6
340/373 - yay for belts
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: around
Posts: 757
|
fuck superchargers, that is all.
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Mod Johnson
2004 Mustang V6
322.8 rwhp
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 5,517
|
i was just ballparking it, prolly closer to 20k
__________________
![]()
TURBO on 7.2psi CHECK OUT MY WEBSITE |
|
|
|
#51 |
|
SP00LIN V6
2000 Mustang V6
437rwhp 402rwtq V6
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 14,690
|
how about this
if your car dynos 220rwhp+ not even 245 as your car is with in this week i will buy you a twin turbo kit and give you ported upper and lower intakes i need a video and dyno in the video. |
|
|
#52 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2k2 Mustang V6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 6,031
|
Andy said hes turning down turbo kit orders now because he needs a real job...
Which doesn't bother me since I have twin turbo kit # 3 out of 3 .... BUT yes its gonna get EXPENSIVE QUICK.
__________________
![]() Selling for friend: Vortech Supercharge kit < 100miles. |
|
|
#53 | |
|
Regular
2004 Mustang V6 Vert.
328/419 @ 4000 rpms
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Delaware County, Pa
Posts: 318
|
single or not
__________________
2004 Ford Mustang V6 Convertible Just hoping to make 500 RWHp ![]() Motor : Mik @ http://rpm-mustangs.com Turbo : Andy @ http://tmaturbo.com/ Intake : Chris @ http://www.crtperformance.webs.com/ Transmission : Darrin @ http://bc-automotive.com/ |
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2k2 Mustang V6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 6,031
|
__________________
![]() Selling for friend: Vortech Supercharge kit < 100miles. |
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 85
|
Like I said once I go to start this endeavor money will not be much of an issue. I know that it will set me back anywhere from 15-20k, that will not be that big of a deal.
Thanks again. |
|
|
#56 |
|
SP00LIN V6
2000 Mustang V6
437rwhp 402rwtq V6
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 14,690
|
i dyno pull is $50
you can get a $5500 kit plus a fully ported top end for FREE |
|
|
#57 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 85
|
Okay all,
I should have done some more home work before I whent and opened my mouth. This is the research that I was able to pull up. The numbers may be off a little. But again, the tunner still had me at 245. After looking at the numbers and re-calculating them I have to agree with you all, this number don't seem practical. The only true way I will know my actual numbers is to have it dynoed. When I have the extra money I will have it dynoed, and take it to the track. After which I will either be be proven false, or whatever. I will post those numbers after I have them. This may be a month or two down the road. I called my local speed shop and they told me that there is only two ways to find out if the car had beed previously stoked or not. 1. Tear it apart and see, or 2. measure the distance between the pistons and the sparkplugs to see the difference. Next time I take it in I'm going to have them look at that. I will then post those measurments. I'm still at a stand still on weather or not I'm going with a T/T or a S/C with Nitros. A T/T seems to be so much more expensive. And It don't seem to get me all that much more HP gain over a good S/C set up with a 175 Nitros shot. And the S/C and Nitros will cost less. and the max HP will be safer for the block. what is everyones opions on this? 2000 Mustang 3.8 193 HP @ 5500 RPM 225 Ft-lbs @ 2800 RPM 3.8L 193 base 20-25: exh 15-20: tuner 6-7: cai 234-245:BHP 2000 F150 4.2 202 HP @ 4800 RPM 252 Ft-Lbs @ 3400 RPM 4.2L Stroker 202 base 20-25: exh 15-20: tuner 6-7: cai 243-254:BHP Gen 4 Mustang The base model came with a 3.8L OHV V6 (232cid) engine rated at 145hp (108kW; 1994-1995) or 150hp (112kW; 1996-1998) and was mated to a standard 5-speed manual transmission or optional 4-speed automatic. Though initially used in the 1994 and 1995 Mustang GT, Ford retired the 302cid Windsor (5.0L) overhead-valve small-block V8 after nearly 40 years of use, replacing it with the newer Modular 4.6L (281cid) SOHC V8 in the 1996 Mustang GT. The 4.6L V8 was initially rated at 215hp (160kW; 1996-1997) but was later increased to 225hp (168kW; 1998).[23] For 1999, the Mustang received Ford's New Edge styling theme with sharper contours, larger wheel arches, and creases in its bodywork, but its basic proportions, interior design, and chassis remained the same as the previous model. The Mustang's powertrains were carried over for 1999 but benefitted from new improvements. The standard 3.8L V6, thanks to a new split-port fuel injection system, now produced 190hp (142kW; 1999-2004)[24] while the Mustang GT's 4.6L V8 saw an increase in output to 260hp (194kW; 1999-2004), thanks to a new head design and other enhancements. This was all the information that everyone else seemed to know that I didn't. Sorry for seeming so unknowledgable about this. I didin't what to be the guy spreading false information. Again thank you all for the great advice. Thank You, 00RoushV6 |
|
|
#58 | |
|
Mod Johnson
2004 Mustang V6
322.8 rwhp
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 5,517
|
the question is how much power are you looking to have in the end. the debate between the two can go on forever, but what numbers are you looking to get?
__________________
![]()
TURBO on 7.2psi CHECK OUT MY WEBSITE |
|
|
|
#59 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2k2 Mustang V6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 6,031
|
^
Yes, we already knew this.... Anyway S/C and 175 shot... well it'll be great for the track. I like having all my power all the time, and more at the touch of a boost controller.
__________________
![]() Selling for friend: Vortech Supercharge kit < 100miles. |
|
|
#60 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 85
|
The real question is this. Which one will be better for my engine in the long run? Either way, I'm going to build it right. Just which one will kill the engine faster? I'm not going to be driving hard all the time. Just the ocational times at the track and of course the ocational killing of a ricer. I'm looking to have some where around 500-600 rwhp by the time I'm done. Either one will get me there, it's a question of which one will kill my engine faster. I'll be posting a link to pics of my ride later.
00RoushV6 Last edited by 00RoushV6 : September 18th, 2008 at 04:20 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Twin turbo versus supercharger
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| twin turbo or supercharger | 00mustang00 | 99-04 | 42 | May 23rd, 2008 04:04 PM |
| Twin Turbo or Supercharger? | bigbobbyb01 | 99-04 | 29 | January 4th, 2008 04:57 PM |
| turbo, twin turbo, or supercharger? | mustangman87 | 5.0 Mustangs | 28 | September 22nd, 2007 10:20 AM |
| Supercharger, Twin Turbo, and Single Turbo | justinsstang | Poweradders | 24 | March 7th, 2007 10:07 PM |
| New To The Mustang... Twin Turbo vs Supercharger | MustangDrew212 | V6 Mustangs | 39 | September 13th, 2006 12:37 PM |