|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|November 24th, 2010 02:11 AM|
Originally Posted by mikejones16 View Post
|November 24th, 2010 01:50 AM|
|MikeJones||I won't be getting a dyno tune for a few years since I don't really need one. I just wanna be able to do some stuff myself and i've wanted a 2-step.|
|November 23rd, 2010 08:39 PM|
Originally Posted by tbirdscwd View Post
|November 23rd, 2010 08:34 PM|
Originally Posted by Pittbull View Post
|November 23rd, 2010 08:28 PM|
|Pittbull||i hate the 2 step on my sct... just sounds like my engine is gunna explode|
|November 23rd, 2010 03:24 PM|
The 2-step can be written into any tune using any tuner (except un-modified automatic cars). Had nothing to do with the hardware. If you have a tuner that uses Diablo, I would use that hands down over the SCT. The Diablo has a ton of upsides including being easier to use and offers better datalogging, but the real only downside to is is that most custom tuners do not use it (a cost thing from what I hear).
Since you tuner already uses it, there is really no downside. I would definitely go Diablo if I were you.
|November 23rd, 2010 02:51 PM|
|Trick Tuners||I'm not sure, but considering all the troubles i've had with the sct 2 step not leaving the first step, i wouldn't try it. Unless you have a turbo its not needed.|
|November 23rd, 2010 01:43 PM|
|MikeJones||Does diablo offer a 2-step?|
|November 23rd, 2010 12:00 AM|
I like them both, but i sell the diablos for $70 less than the SCT. If i were i customer, it would be diablo for sure. I put the same tunes on both of them.
Originally Posted by ajm View Post
|November 22nd, 2010 11:18 PM|
|SWEET2KSTANG||i like the diablo as well, especially for end user stuff. the sct is quicker and is a plus. its personal preference. both will do the same, both are good tuners, and is a win/win if you go with either. if your tuner favors diablo, i suggest to go with that.|
|November 22nd, 2010 11:10 PM|
|November 22nd, 2010 10:40 PM|
|Pittbull||i have SCT and i like it, real user friendly. ive heard some unsatisfied people go off about diablo but i dont have any personal experiance with it. if ur tuner likes diablo more thats what id go with mike, since he's more familair with the software|
|November 22nd, 2010 10:38 PM|
Ive used them both. started with sct went to diablo then back to sct. No particular reason other than for tuning reasons. Im not biased towards either one.
For what its worth.
Sct will load faster
Sct will save logs quicker
Sct computer software is easier to use
The diablo hand held live data and such is eaiser to use and i feel is all around better than the sct live data
Eaiser to make adjustments on the user end/little more user friendly
cons are above
|November 22nd, 2010 10:37 PM|
|chiefsmustang20||i went with sct because a place in phoenix convinced me now i moved back home and no1 within 200 miles with a ruputable name uses sct|
|November 22nd, 2010 10:26 PM|
|bigjohnstud4200||their is not much of a difference, but I like the Diablo better.. not sure why.|
|November 22nd, 2010 10:24 PM|
Diablosport or SCT
The tuner I go to uses both but likes Diablosport more. I'm kinda geared more towards SCT. What are some of the pro's and cons of each? They both cost the same.