Your attitude and your continued defenses of ANY police shooting inform your intentions. You can continue to believe that all police are good people and would NEVER do anything wrong. I'll live in the real world. Do we know all the facts? Maybe not but there sure is a lot of circumstantial evidence that is pointing in that direction.
I get it. You're defending your own. Like I said.....Brotherhood...Ö
The real world huh? Your whole response is based off of another lie. So, show where I defended this police shooting. Quote it and show me where I defended it, and don't take a sentence or two out of its context. You live in a world that you make up in your head. You continually base arguments off of things that aren't true. You use lies like "defense of ANY police shooting" and then base opinions on lies you make up. That's your real world? I have to go back and quote the actual things I said just to bring you back to the real world.
The fact that you continue to make things up totally discredits any argument you can make. Just like this one about me defending any police shooting. It just goes to show that you will go to any length to try and smear someone else, with no facts, in order to support your agenda. You use a completely false statement that you can not back up (but I can quote posts that show exactly the opposite), and end with some stupid statement like "defending your own." Every time you make these posts, it shows your true colors. You will create flat out lies about any situation, and here in the real world, we call that a lack of character. I haven't defended, nor condemned, the actions of this officer from the aspect of it being racial. I did, however, say it was a terrible shooting, but you must actually beilieve your own lies. I'm holding off on the racial aspect, because we don't have facts. You're giving the guy the death sentence, solely based on the shooting being racial, without knowing a single fact.
So let me ask you this. You're forced to shoot an intruder in your house that happens to be black. Do you want me, the one who waits to hear the facts to be on the jury, or you, the one who made up his mind when it was white on black to be on the jury?
This time, let's try to use words I've actually said, rather than make something up. I'd like to say you can do it, but I know that's not true.
So to recap, the shooting was definitely a bad shoot, and the officer should go to prison. This whole debate has been on the media (and you conclusion jumpers), immediately saying it was racial without knowing any facts on what went down. That's it. Nothing less, nothing more. Just the immediate labeling of it being racial.
Your statements prove that you hate police, all LEO are racist, and all shooting of blacks people are racist.
---------- Post added at 08:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:56 AM ----------
So really, just a quick summary of this, just so you don't post another 3 paragraphs, defending something that you made up.
White officer wrongly shoots an innocent black man. The media, and others, immediately label it racial.
We all agree it was a bad shoot, the officer was in the wrong, and should go to prison. (Regardless of the last fabricated post you made)
Media immediately labels it as being racial.
I make a comment like "what does being black have to do with it? Why can't it just be officer shoots in innocent man?"
A few of you keep telling me why it's racial
I say several times, as quoted above, that maybe it was racial, or maybe it wasn't. We don't know because we weren't there and don't have the facts.
FACT: we don't know because we don't have the facts, so I reserve my judgment, but you stick to it being racially motivated. You based your opinion off of not knowing, and I haven't even formed an opinion on this aspect of the shooting. I haven't formed an opinion because I don't know. So, you keep telling me I'm wrong because I haven't formed an opinion, and I take issue to people immediately making an assumption that it was racially motivated without knowing facts.
So what you're telling me, is that I'm wrong to wait for facts, and should just immiedestly assume it was racially motivated, like the media (and you) want me to.
And I'm in the wrong here?