It also implicates the state department. Maybe they discussed his golf game?
The report also says even though it was through a 2nd party that the information obtained appeared credible.It implicates the Department of State? You are aware the the Department of States' job is to talk to representatives of foreign governments?
This is a circus. Trump will never be convicted in the Senate. He will stay in office. The entire charade is about the 2020 election but Democrats in their blind hatred are destroying what some say is their best candidate in the process.
Hearsay: 1. information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor. 2. Law, the report of another person's words by a witness, which is usually disallowed as evidence in a court of law.
They very clearly did say it.
Yes. Credible for an investigation, not a courts martial (impeachment). "Who Investigates The Whistleblower Case? Whomever the Department of Justice decides is appropriate to investigate the case. So, if it’s a defense case, it might be one investigatory agency. If it’s a Medicare case, it might be another. If it’s some kind of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) case, it might be another entity entirely.'The report also says even though it was through a 2nd party that the information obtained appeared credible.
No. That's the mission of the swamp - to manufacture something nefarious and manipulate due-process. It doesn't matter that it's all bullshit - they still get to perform their show. Can't you see it? This is another cooked-up bullshit story about nothing; it's a sham. We're only going through the motions to satisfy protocol. Trump might be an obtuse loudmouth, but I don't question his patriotism. The transcript is clear ... he didn't promise or demand anything. Nothing else matters. No quid-pro-quo, no case - end of story. He didn't break the law. Game over. The "whistleblower's" complaint is just anti-Trump partisan propaganda and supposition which was cleverly distorted and rolled-into a bullshit allegation (mud-slinging).If the information in the complaint was horseshit it would have been dead in the water right there ...
There's nothing "obviously illegal" about it. That's why Dems are performing their algebraic arguments in an effort to prove one thing is equal to another. If a violation of law were obvious, that wouldn't really be necessary, would it?LOL! The twisting and turning trying to justify the obvious illegality occurring right in front of their eyes is telling. Patriots? Pffffft…………
An emphatic... NO! I don't believe any of that. And I didn't mean to suggest to anyone that I do. I think it takes a lot of reading into my comment to come up with all that. But if that is how you read it, I'm sorry. Let me read your post again.so much delicious irony
---------- Post added at 09:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:17 AM ----------
Hold on, are you implying you're buying into this "Civil War" **** our "patriotic" president is peddling?