hypothetical power question...

1475 Views 53 Replies 12 Participants Last post by 94v6blkndred, Feb 11, 2008

94v6blkndred

Discussion Starter · Feb 9, 2008

I dont know if i would ever do this but it crossed my mind today and idk if there was a write up like this so im SORRY

dont bash me for repost...not looking at if "it would be cheaper just to do such and such instead" just kinda wanna know this.....Say i took my 94 v6...did a split port swap, bought the M112 adaptor and SC and all the accesories and went with a 4.2L stroker kit what kind of gains would you see with this..is it possible? Would it be better to just keep the 3.8 displacement or what? Like i said again i doubt i will ever do this i just wanna know! thanks guys!

41 - 54 of 54 Posts

El_Cangri

· #41 · Feb 9, 2008

IMHO
i dont care for cars value.. i just want to make em different...

sooooo if my stang is worth 8k as it is i wouldnt care spending 12grands to make it the fastest in this whole damn import island... civic are so normal and 10 sec mirages.. i dont want to be part of the crowd i wanna stand out of the crowd

whitemustang02

· #42 · Feb 9, 2008

El_Cangri said:
IMHO
i dont care for cars value.. i just want to make em different...

sooooo if my stang is worth 8k as it is i wouldnt care spending 12grands to make it the fastest in this whole damn import island... civic are so normal and 10 sec mirages.. i dont want to be part of the crowd i wanna stand out of the crowd

very true any one who wants to make a fast car realy can't Be concerned with resale value

Hell I will probably end up spending more on my engine alone then what I paied for the car.

94v6blkndred

Discussion Starter · #43 · Feb 9, 2008

exactly! woo! some fellow TRUE stangers who have the same thought as me

Zatrekaz

· #44 · Feb 10, 2008

KBB says my car is worth about 11k... to me, you cant put a price on it.

Few years from now, when its majorly modded with everything I can get my hands on for more power, totaling well over 10k and KBB says its only worth 7k, its the same....

I saw a quote, was prob on this site: Speed cost, how fast do you want to go?

TurboLX

· #45 · Feb 10, 2008

theres a guy on turbo mustangs with an M112 and a bone stock bottom end 3.8 making 430+hp

ESG-642T

· #46 · Feb 10, 2008

TurboLX said:
theres a guy on turbo mustangs with an M112 and a bone stock bottom end 3.8 making 430+hp

Link?

TurboLX

· #47 · Feb 10, 2008

Yea lemme see if i can find it again, i saw it the other day, but you gotta be a member to view the board

ESG-642T

· #48 · Feb 10, 2008

TurboLX said:
Yea lemme see if i can find it again, i saw it the other day, but you gotta be a member to view the board

Find the link I'll join

El_Cangri

· #49 · Feb 10, 2008

i'l join just to see the damn link lol

94v6blkndred

Discussion Starter · #50 · Feb 10, 2008

hhaha yea no ****

shadow5403

· #51 · Feb 11, 2008

94v6blkndred said:
KB>M112 power wise right?

whipple>KB>M112

just have a built engine or youll go boom.

Whipple Industries

ESG-642T

· #52 · Feb 11, 2008

shadow5403 said:
whipple>KB>M112

just have a built engine or youll go boom.

Whipple Industries

Could have sworn...

KB>Whipple

Aha, Oh well Turbo>them all

shadow5403

· #53 · Feb 11, 2008

check that link...that whipple is bigger than the KB AND a little more efficient. I always thought KB was better too.

94v6blkndred

Discussion Starter · #54 · Feb 11, 2008

that thing is oh so nice...

41 - 54 of 54 Posts

This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.