There is a suspension thread in the modular forum that has tons of great info and is up to date. all i can say about the kit is lose the strut tower brace 
Is it just not needed or not very good quality from MM on that part? and thanks for the info I'll check that thread out too.There is a suspension thread in the modular forum that has tons of great info and is up to date. all i can say about the kit is lose the strut tower brace![]()
I was wondering that too, but I went through the suspension thread in the 4.6 section and found that the strut tower brace will stiffen the front end suspension decreasing the front grip and also cause some understeer.id also like to know why to ditch the fron strut brace, when back in the 60's for the trans am races the old stangs had front strut tower braces?
There is a suspension thread in the modular forum that has tons of great info and is up to date. all i can say about the kit is lose the strut tower brace![]()
i would love just a 4 or 6 but im yet to see one in an sn95 that was nicely intergrated into the stock interior.id love a 10 point cage....
strut tower brace is not vital. nor is it needed for coilover setup.
caster camber plates are needed for a coilover setup for the extra
rigidity.
What flex on the top? I've never seen any numbers from anyone that's actually taken measurements as to how much the top of the k-member flexes; just internet hearsay that it does, and you should get an STB because of it. There's just no real lateral force on the top of the struts.question, if the STB is no good, whats ur opinion on the 4 point k member brace, which reduces flex on the bottom, and the STB would reduce flex from the top