Modded Mustang Forums banner

1 - 20 of 25 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
14 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Had a dyno on my 2011 5.0 GTCS on Friday.

First dyno back in March with no mods:
360rwhp 353rwtq

roush axle-back, C&L CAI and Bama 93Race Tune:
389rwhp, 378rwtq

I figured my numbers had to have increased because I could feel the difference.

Next mods: bbk long tube headers and xpipe. hopefully putting me over 400rwhp.

Brian
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10 Posts
i know ppl say all dynos are different but seems all of bamas tunes seem light on the Hp gains. I know of many ppl with lund tunes pushing 400+ just tune and intake.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
706 Posts
I have a half dozen tunes and by seat of the pants feel the Lund tune is an animal compared to the rest.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
i have the BAMA tune, 91 performance, JLT intake and catback Heartthrob exhaust and mine went from 375HP stock to 398HP with mods.

nice jump on power!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
664 Posts
Pretty similar to the numbers I put down with Bamas 93R tune
 

·
Token asian guy
Joined
·
2,783 Posts
I really need to go to a dyno to see how where I'm at.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
518 Posts
Hoping to get mine dyno-d in stock trim some time this weekend. Then its time to install the Cat back Bassani exhaust, and order my CAI and Tuner.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
664 Posts
Is this an auto, I guess? Stock numbers seem a bit low?
I hope not considering mine only put down 386 with a similar setup and a 6MT
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
706 Posts
The 93 aggressive tune blows away the other tunes i have away. You punch it and you are side ways. It will pin you into your seat. He is the Godfather of tuning.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
664 Posts
You really think that by changing tuners were gonna see a 10+ gain in RWHP?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14 Posts
Discussion Starter #17
It would be nice if someone had some dyno results(same car same dyno) comparing the bama 93race tune or a similar tune vs the lund 93 aggressive tune.

200 dollars for 10 more hp would be good.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
664 Posts
I agree. I don't want to spend the extra cash on a different tune if its only gonna give me a couple RWHP. If someone has comparison results and I knew the gains were there I would be more comfortable spending the cash.
 

·
Yes, I am your Daddy
Joined
·
983 Posts
I have a dyno run with the 93 octane with the BBR tune on the Steeda CAI and flowmaster american thunder Axlebacks. I put down 390rwhp and 372tq, with air/fuel mix right on 12.4 thru all the powerband.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,757 Posts
Had a dyno on my 2011 5.0 GTCS on Friday.

First dyno back in March with no mods:
360rwhp 353rwtq

roush axle-back, C&L CAI and Bama 93Race Tune:
389rwhp, 378rwtq

I figured my numbers had to have increased because I could feel the difference.

Next mods: bbk long tube headers and xpipe. hopefully putting me over 400rwhp.

Brian
Should be getting a little more with those simple mods. Better tuning should get you closer if not at 400 without long tubes and x pipe. That 5.0 is craving a better tune.
 
1 - 20 of 25 Posts
Top