Modded Mustang Forums banner
61 - 80 of 178 Posts
Lol never had so many people quote me in a row :lol

In that case, I just won't go forced induction lol. I'll most likely be okay with 350 hp + 100 shot lol glad I got that cleared up. What is the weak part in running more boost? The rotating assembly?


High compression causes heat. Boost causes heat. Heat causes detonation. Detonation breaks rods and pistons, even forged ones. To prevent detonation you have to run a much higher octane fuel like E85, avation fuel or race gas.

On the other hand, high compression likes nitrous (to a point). Nitrous has a cooling effect on the incoming air reducing heat.
 
Discussion starter · #62 ·
well, I dont want to go that high in compression. mainly since they dont see e85, aviation fuel or race gas at the gas stations near me :lol what compression should i go with, and how should i do it for 93 octane?
 
well, I dont want to go that high in compression. mainly since they dont see e85, aviation fuel or race gas at the gas stations near me :lol what compression should i go with, and how should i do it for 93 octane?
It is unlikely you will hit 350 rwhp natually aspirated if you don't. Most of the high horsepower n/a motors are running 12.5:1 compression ratio. Some 13.8:1. I've heard of one 14.1:1 motor. There was one that was reported breaking 350 with 11.5:1. That is the lowest I've ever heard of. There really isn't a precise cutoff point. A lot of times you can retard the timing to run 93 octane fuel. But, then you loose horsepower.
 
Discussion starter · #65 ·
well, I cant really get high compression without digging into the block right? and what kind of compression would I be looking at with the trick flow heads? there is so much to remember with this stuff :bash:
 
well, I cant really get high compression without digging into the block right? and what kind of compression would I be looking at with the trick flow heads? there is so much to remember with this stuff :bash:

just try doing, TFS 38cc heads to bump up compression slightly, to almost 10:1 (its closer to 9.7:1) and with some nice stage 2 cams and the rest of the bolt ons you should see 330-350ish HP na...

refer to the video i posted on the 1st page, he hit 340 NA... WITHOUT upgrading his rotating assembly

11:1 is a good target for street friendly manners and fuel.
agree'd, but then he'd have to get new pistons to bump compression, which in reality for 350hp NA isnt "needed" just helps get there faster
 
350 is not that hard. It's the next 50 that gets expensive and quick. :). My car put down 399 yesterday on 2 year old 93 octane. With a few changes and some fresh fuel it should easily surpass 400.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FORDY9ER
350 is not that hard. It's the next 50 that gets expensive and quick. :). My car put down 399 yesterday on 2 year old 93 octane. With a few changes and some fresh fuel it should easily surpass 400.
unless you do the next 50 with N20 :naughty:
 
350 is not that hard. It's the next 50 that gets expensive and quick. :). My car put down 399 yesterday on 2 year old 93 octane. With a few changes and some fresh fuel it should easily surpass 400.
I thought you were running 11.5:1+ compression ratio? Also, others with slightly higher compression and running E85 fuel have had trouble reaching your numbers. I don't really know but your extra headwork and type of cams might be making the difference.
 
I thought you were running 11.5:1+ compression ratio? Also, others with slightly higher compression and running E85 fuel have had trouble reaching your numbers. I don't really know but your extra headwork and type of cams might be making the difference.
haha yeah he has 11.5:1 compression and like stage 5 or 6 cams with TFS heads and 150# dual springs... he also has a forged rotating assembly with I beam rods

350 with stock rotating assembly is VERY doable... anything more and you're going to have to change your pistons for higher compression.
 
350 with stock rotating assembly is VERY doable... anything more and you're going to have to change your pistons for higher compression.
I suppose its possible. I just haven't read about anyone who has actually done it. Most end up with around 320 rwhp.
 
I thought you were running 11.5:1+ compression ratio? Also, others with slightly higher compression and running E85 fuel have had trouble reaching your numbers. I don't really know but your extra headwork and type of cams might be making the difference.
His intake as well as aggressive cams are the reason why he has a higher peak than most, he's sacrificing some bottom end to get there (take the average of his horsepower and torque and it comes out to 364 versus a more balanced setup like mine). Regardless, still very impressive on 93 octane, just cant wait to actually take full advantage of the timing on e85... only running 19* currently.
 
I suppose its possible. I just haven't read about anyone who has actually done it. Most end up with around 320 rwhp.
look at the video post i made on the first page :)
2v stock rotating assembly 340HP; TFS heads (with no porting done), and comp cams (which i think if he did a better cam he'd have hit higher numbers)!
 
Discussion starter · #79 ·
How much more would notched pistons and that cost? Would it be worth doing since the engine would be apart already?


Sent from my iPhone using Autoguide
 
some engine shops will throw in piston notching for free if you buy a short block from them. I was lucky enough with MMR cutting me a deal, so you never know ;)
 
61 - 80 of 178 Posts