I don't really know much about motors and all that jazz, but how hard would it be to get 350 hp while staying NA?
Sent from my iPhone using Autoguide
Sent from my iPhone using Autoguide
Lol never had so many people quote me in a row :lol
In that case, I just won't go forced induction lol. I'll most likely be okay with 350 hp + 100 shot lol glad I got that cleared up. What is the weak part in running more boost? The rotating assembly?
It is unlikely you will hit 350 rwhp natually aspirated if you don't. Most of the high horsepower n/a motors are running 12.5:1 compression ratio. Some 13.8:1. I've heard of one 14.1:1 motor. There was one that was reported breaking 350 with 11.5:1. That is the lowest I've ever heard of. There really isn't a precise cutoff point. A lot of times you can retard the timing to run 93 octane fuel. But, then you loose horsepower.well, I dont want to go that high in compression. mainly since they dont see e85, aviation fuel or race gas at the gas stations near me :lol what compression should i go with, and how should i do it for 93 octane?
well, I cant really get high compression without digging into the block right? and what kind of compression would I be looking at with the trick flow heads? there is so much to remember with this stuff :bash:
agree'd, but then he'd have to get new pistons to bump compression, which in reality for 350hp NA isnt "needed" just helps get there faster11:1 is a good target for street friendly manners and fuel.
we established that thanks :facepalm:Cheaper to get a supercharger than to build 350hp NA.
unless you do the next 50 with N20 :naughty:350 is not that hard. It's the next 50 that gets expensive and quick.. My car put down 399 yesterday on 2 year old 93 octane. With a few changes and some fresh fuel it should easily surpass 400.
I thought you were running 11.5:1+ compression ratio? Also, others with slightly higher compression and running E85 fuel have had trouble reaching your numbers. I don't really know but your extra headwork and type of cams might be making the difference.350 is not that hard. It's the next 50 that gets expensive and quick.. My car put down 399 yesterday on 2 year old 93 octane. With a few changes and some fresh fuel it should easily surpass 400.
haha yeah he has 11.5:1 compression and like stage 5 or 6 cams with TFS heads and 150# dual springs... he also has a forged rotating assembly with I beam rodsI thought you were running 11.5:1+ compression ratio? Also, others with slightly higher compression and running E85 fuel have had trouble reaching your numbers. I don't really know but your extra headwork and type of cams might be making the difference.
I suppose its possible. I just haven't read about anyone who has actually done it. Most end up with around 320 rwhp.350 with stock rotating assembly is VERY doable... anything more and you're going to have to change your pistons for higher compression.
His intake as well as aggressive cams are the reason why he has a higher peak than most, he's sacrificing some bottom end to get there (take the average of his horsepower and torque and it comes out to 364 versus a more balanced setup like mine). Regardless, still very impressive on 93 octane, just cant wait to actually take full advantage of the timing on e85... only running 19* currently.I thought you were running 11.5:1+ compression ratio? Also, others with slightly higher compression and running E85 fuel have had trouble reaching your numbers. I don't really know but your extra headwork and type of cams might be making the difference.
look at the video post i made on the first pageI suppose its possible. I just haven't read about anyone who has actually done it. Most end up with around 320 rwhp.