Modded Mustang Forums banner
Cancel
Create thread New Garage Forums

New 2V Mod Motor Results

Jump to Latest
121 - 140 of 237 Posts
#121 ·
Mr. Callahan is doing a fine job. It's funny how before he accomplished this, some people said it wouldn't even be possible to come close to 350 RWHP. Now that he's done it and will still get more out of it, some people are saying that he could have gotten more by using better parts?..... WTFF! Before it wasn't possible and now he didn't get enough? I'm just going to take this as a laughing matter.
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#122 ·
hey tampa, i always knew that 350 was possible, but he was shooting for 400 N/A. So dont put words into my mouth. Because I know you are pointing that comment towards me.


Anyways congrads to AC and i am being sincere. I also feel that after seeing these results that 375-380 is possible with his set up, but not much more than that!


Anyway congrads
 
#124 ·
just to put this out there, i never said the power was impossible, i just didnt think it would be very streetable, but form looking at the power curve on his graphs, i think its beautiful. he did a great job getting the streetability along wiht the numbers out of the n/a 2v. ive seen people make 490 rwhp with a n/a 2v, but it was a custom intake, and huge cams and big heads, and it didnt start making power till 4250-4400 rpms and revved to over 8000, now that kind of motor imo is not streetable. but what miller has done is awsome, he got big numbers with great streetability/


as for people saying that the 350 isnt alot becaus eyou used to ls1 making a lot more with bolt ons. yeah they do, but they have a great set of heads and a lot of cubes. a fully ported set of 2v heads will abrely outflow a stock set of ls1 heads, thus requiring forced induction to make big power numbers. why do you think it is so popular? becasue its the only way to make the big power (500+)
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
Discussion starter · #125 ·
I know this is a little of topic, but has anyone noticed if BBK actually started producing the intake with the variable runners. I have called them several times, but I never get a call-back. I was looking at the intake in one of their flyers and I feel like their intake would be great for an application like this. The motor would be abl to keep the TQ of the long runners and still be capable of 7000rpm's+ with the short runners.
 
#126 ·
i have to ask since you've upped your compression and things like that are you using an ARP headstud/bolt kit and what type of head gaskets. as for the nitrous system what type of delivery system and would there be a benefit to useing a typhoon alumium intake for durability and higher shots. Also aside from all the typhoon junk threads would more power be avalible with a "typhoon style" intake with a port job
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
Discussion starter · #127 ·
zerofx150 said:
i have to ask since you've upped your compression and things like that are you using an ARP headstud/bolt kit and what type of head gaskets. FEL-Pro gaskets and bolts as for the nitrous system what type of delivery system single fogger (ZEX)and would there be a benefit to useing a typhoon alumium intake for durability and higher shots.No. A single fogger nozzle should not be used on the stock intake any higher than 175 HP IMO, because you stand a high risk of burning the back two plugs up. Also aside from all the typhoon junk threads would more power be avalible with a "typhoon style" intake with a port job I don't know how you would port the typhoon intake when some of the turns are inaccessible. Investing time in a cheap intake is not efficient IMO and time is what you would need to make that intake work. I see zero advantage to running the Typhoon or the Hardballr other than the Bling factor
Click to expand...
Cool??
 
#128 ·
I think that the BBK has a great design. I am going to see what i can dig up about it. I want to maybe use it on my motor down the road when i have the money.
 
#131 ·
That would be wonderful.

BTW, my comment above was no directed at anyone in specific... Obviously it found the perfect fit by itself. I respect you all and would like nothing more than meet some of you and have a good time. (not in a gay way)

Moving on, I think now is the time to continue and improve what has been created to the point where the 2V will no longer be minimized as "little 2V".
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#132 ·
well............... it sitll needs a power adder to make big numbers
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#134 ·
acmillr said:
At 81 degrees and 45 percent humidity, the numbers would be higher if anything. However, I'm sure we could find out what the multiplier is to get the right numbers. SAE are not always lower. I have dynoed several times in heat over 80 degrees where the corrected numbers were higher. Altitude will also have a dramatic effect on SAE vs. uncorrected numbers (not in this case, mind you).

Everyone says that anything over 10.5:1 is playing with fire, but I been running as far up as 12:1 for years on all qualities of pump and have never had a problem.

I knew the naysayers would filter in before long. I can assure you that you have no idea how much time and effort has gone into this build. I will also point out that this is a NEW motor and I expect the numbers to go up with break in. Also, I am sure that an aluminum DS and elecric water pump will place my numbers well above 360.
Click to expand...
Your numbers are standard corrected. SAE corrected will produce lower numbers every time. Someone as smart as you should know this. Now back those numbers up with real world timeslips at the track.
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#136 · (Edited)
drgnracin72 said:
as for people saying that the 350 isnt alot becaus eyou used to ls1 making a lot more with bolt ons. yeah they do, but they have a great set of heads and a lot of cubes. a fully ported set of 2v heads will abrely outflow a stock set of ls1 heads, thus requiring forced induction to make big power numbers. why do you think it is so popular? becasue its the only way to make the big power (500+)
Click to expand...
Not people, just me. I own a Mustang and like it alot, but it is far inferior to the LS1. I never said 350 wasn't alot of power, I simply said I would expect more with a heads and cam car.

Again, I apolagize if I have offended you guys.
 
#137 ·
im not offended, its just general knowledge that a 2v modular does not make a ton of power n/a. im with you all the way on the ls1, is a far superior design and better suited for making power.
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
Discussion starter · #138 ·
JayC said:
Your numbers are standard corrected. SAE corrected will produce lower numbers every time. Someone as smart as you should know this. Now back those numbers up with real world timeslips at the track.
Click to expand...
Bullshit. You do not understand hoe the "corrected" numbers work. Maybe you need to read a few more articles before you try to reprint information.
 
Discussion starter · #139 ·
JayC said:
So true...any snot-nosed kid with a 100 shot will hand him his ass:D Building a N/A 4.6 is such a waste:cool:
Click to expand...
That snot nosed kid better have more than a 100 shot.

It looks like I'm gonna have to use the ignore feature on another Jr high kid. Please, go ask your daddy to explain how all this works again..........
 
121 - 140 of 237 Posts
About this Discussion
236 Replies
48 Participants
Last post:
gills99stang
Modded Mustang Forums
posts
6.3M
members
83K
Since
2005
A forum community dedicated to all Ford Mustang owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, racing, builds, modifications, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
96 - 04 Modular Mustangs 5.0 Mustangs New Members Introductions Classic Mustangs