ok so right now i have pretty much a list of everything i wanna do to the ole 232........or.........i could spend that money and get a gt (dream car by the way)........which would be a better investment?
to compair gt's and v6's in price u need to look for simaler condtion. so what that mean is if the v6 is a 2002 the gt needs to be a 2002 if the v6 is low mileage then the gt needs to be low mileage, if the v6 is in good condtion so does the gt,
understand what im saying. not trying to put u down but trying to clear up why chris is arguing with u
u can not get a low mileage good condtion gt for much less then 3-4 grand more then a simaler condtion, same year v6.
that is the point he is trying to make.
and u r right that u can get a gt for less then some v6's, however that gt will be lower qualty then the v6.
because i already have a v8 project car, so i just need a daily driver that gets decent gas mileage, and i said loan papers and my drivers license, thats a little more valid that just holding up some keys dip ****.....and since when did value of the car all of a sudden come into play? i thought we were talkin performance here, once again just trying to find a way around it, the original arguement was that a GT was a better platform than a v6 which IT IS but now ur bringing value of the car into it and everything, so yeah its impossible to argue with you, even if i found a perfect low milage mint condition GT for 6 grand u would still find something to bitch about itdude i dont care aboutyour mach one
i'll take a picture next to a 65 mint condition mustang say both are mine
you wont know now will you
i can take a pic of the 65, my car, a saleen, a GT-500 hold all the keys take a picture and say yea i own them all here is my proof
then when the camera is put away hand everyone there keys and dip
like ive said ORIGINALLY if you take the savings from buying a GT and getting a v6 your v6 will be faster
and in that case why do you own a V6 instead of a GT
I suppose if you get to arbitrarily decide which points are valid, it's really easy to win arguments, huh?ok your point means nothing in this argument as ive stated which is why i puta long time ago
your argument is bliss
you know what never ****in mind with youim done my repeating myself dude you've yet to prove me wrong DONEI suppose if you get to arbitrarily decide which points are valid, it's really easy to win arguments, huh?
BTW, I never claimed it ruined your previous argument... My only point was that your implication that GT's were significantly more expensive than $23k was wrong. It wasn't meant to prove that GT's were better or anything else, only that your implication was incorrect.
OK, well, I'm really calling it a night, now.
What's the use in arguing anyway? I'm either wrong, or if not, my argument will be deemed invalid anyway.![]()
ok you said performanceive mention plenty of timesbecause i already have a v8 project car, so i just need a daily driver that gets decent gas mileage, and i said loan papers and my drivers license, thats a little more valid that just holding up some keys dip ****.....and since when did value of the car all of a sudden come into play? i thought we were talkin performance here, once again just trying to find a way around it, the original arguement was that a GT was a better platform than a v6 which IT IS but now ur bringing value of the car into it and everything, so yeah its impossible to argue with you, even if i found a perfect low milage mint condition GT for 6 grand u would still find something to bitch about it
the day you beat me at the track you can have my car
ok prove this i want a reliable daily driven 500rwhp carill fill you in lol im trying to say that a GT is a better platform than a v6, but chris keeps throwing in well you can't get a good GT for the same value as a v6, or you could spend the extra money to mod a v6 that u spent on a GT blah blah blah, see what i mean, he cant accept the fact that was originally being argued, he has to throw in all this other crap to try and defend himself
dude HOW CAN YOU NOT FACTOR MONEY!!!dude i never said anything about cost, damn how many times do i have to say to factor out the money, everyone makes a different amount of money, its not a constant variable for everyone so its NOT A RELIABLE FACTOR, jesus, so with that being the case a GT would be faster than a v6, get over it already
dude i never said anything about cost, damn how many times do i have to say to factor out the money, everyone makes a different amount of money, its not a constant variable for everyone so its NOT A RELIABLE FACTOR, jesus, so with that being the case a GT would be faster than a v6, get over it already
money left over after selling the v6 and buying the gt and having money left over?then it all depends on how much money he is talkin about, if he trades in his v6 and pays the difference to get a GT it all depends on whether or not the difference he paid is enough to mod out a v6 and make it faster than a stock GT, but who knows, he could have money left over still to mod the GT if he went that route
power is power just because its turbo doesnt mean it'll last if you put 500hp..not to take sides or anything but cant a gt could make more than 400 with a stock block example: just a kb supercharger kit will make 400+ hp on pump gas. so theroetically wouldnt a turbo kit make somewhere in the area of 500 hp? not trying to stir the pot anymore than it already is...