Modded Mustang Forums banner
161 - 180 of 313 Posts
to compair gt's and v6's in price u need to look for simaler condtion. so what that mean is if the v6 is a 2002 the gt needs to be a 2002 if the v6 is low mileage then the gt needs to be low mileage, if the v6 is in good condtion so does the gt,
understand what im saying. not trying to put u down but trying to clear up why chris is arguing with u
u can not get a low mileage good condtion gt for much less then 3-4 grand more then a simaler condtion, same year v6.
that is the point he is trying to make.
and u r right that u can get a gt for less then some v6's, however that gt will be lower qualty then the v6.

CLAPS CLAPS CLAPS!!!
THANK YOU
my point EXACTLY:yes
 
dude i dont care aboutyour mach one
i'll take a picture next to a 65 mint condition mustang say both are mine
you wont know now will you
i can take a pic of the 65, my car, a saleen, a GT-500 hold all the keys take a picture and say yea i own them all here is my proof
then when the camera is put away hand everyone there keys and dip


like ive said ORIGINALLY if you take the savings from buying a GT and getting a v6 your v6 will be faster


and in that case why do you own a V6 instead of a GT
because i already have a v8 project car, so i just need a daily driver that gets decent gas mileage, and i said loan papers and my drivers license, thats a little more valid that just holding up some keys dip ****.....and since when did value of the car all of a sudden come into play? i thought we were talkin performance here, once again just trying to find a way around it, the original arguement was that a GT was a better platform than a v6 which IT IS but now ur bringing value of the car into it and everything, so yeah its impossible to argue with you, even if i found a perfect low milage mint condition GT for 6 grand u would still find something to bitch about it
 
ok your point means nothing in this argument as ive stated which is why i put :rolleyes: a long time ago
your argument is bliss
I suppose if you get to arbitrarily decide which points are valid, it's really easy to win arguments, huh?

BTW, I never claimed it ruined your previous argument... My only point was that your implication that GT's were significantly more expensive than $23k was wrong. It wasn't meant to prove that GT's were better or anything else, only that your implication was incorrect.

OK, well, I'm really calling it a night, now.

What's the use in arguing anyway? I'm either wrong, or if not, my argument will be deemed invalid anyway. :)
 
I suppose if you get to arbitrarily decide which points are valid, it's really easy to win arguments, huh?

BTW, I never claimed it ruined your previous argument... My only point was that your implication that GT's were significantly more expensive than $23k was wrong. It wasn't meant to prove that GT's were better or anything else, only that your implication was incorrect.

OK, well, I'm really calling it a night, now.

What's the use in arguing anyway? I'm either wrong, or if not, my argument will be deemed invalid anyway. :)
you know what never ****in mind with youim done my repeating myself dude you've yet to prove me wrong DONE
 
yeah well now u know how i feel, i dont know how many times ive repeated myself and u just keep throwing different variables into play that totally throws off the original arguement, but its ok chris, you can go back to jacking off to you v6 now, we'll leave you 2 alone
 
ill fill you in lol im trying to say that a GT is a better platform than a v6, but chris keeps throwing in well you can't get a good GT for the same value as a v6, or you could spend the extra money to mod a v6 that u spent on a GT blah blah blah, see what i mean, he cant accept the fact that was originally being argued, he has to throw in all this other crap to try and defend himself
 
because i already have a v8 project car, so i just need a daily driver that gets decent gas mileage, and i said loan papers and my drivers license, thats a little more valid that just holding up some keys dip ****.....and since when did value of the car all of a sudden come into play? i thought we were talkin performance here, once again just trying to find a way around it, the original arguement was that a GT was a better platform than a v6 which IT IS but now ur bringing value of the car into it and everything, so yeah its impossible to argue with you, even if i found a perfect low milage mint condition GT for 6 grand u would still find something to bitch about it
ok you said performanceive mention plenty of times
stock motor vs stock motor any amount of mods
both cars will run the same times

and money and value is a HUGE ROLL!
if i had gotten a GT i'd have $4k less in modds then i do now
and shut up you cant prove my statments wrong dude

bothmotors handle up to about 400rwhp
once that point is met both are on borrowed time
the v6 OBVIOUSLY made it to that 400rwhp point FOR LESS MONEY
HE LOST LESS and gained took more time off his 1/4 then the GT say 5 seconds

the GT paid more and is running the same as the v6, has to deal with the fact a d v6 can hang with him and paid more, pays more gas,more insurance and he only took off 3 seconds from the 1/4


so lets put it ANOTHER WAY
$7k in mods for both the GT and V6
the both will run mid low 11s
the v6 was a 16 second car the GT a 14 second
so truly the V6 made more out if then the GT and paid less for his car

THAT IS MY POINT ANYTHING ELSE IS JUST **** OUT OF YOUR MOUTH
 
ill fill you in lol im trying to say that a GT is a better platform than a v6, but chris keeps throwing in well you can't get a good GT for the same value as a v6, or you could spend the extra money to mod a v6 that u spent on a GT blah blah blah, see what i mean, he cant accept the fact that was originally being argued, he has to throw in all this other crap to try and defend himself
ok prove this i want a reliable daily driven 500rwhp car

which car will make the 500rwhp faster? and for a cheaper price?

that is your argument correct?

or how about even 400rwhp

either way it'll cost the same but more embarrassing for the GT owner
 
dude i never said anything about cost, damn how many times do i have to say to factor out the money, everyone makes a different amount of money, its not a constant variable for everyone so its NOT A RELIABLE FACTOR, jesus, so with that being the case a GT would be faster than a v6, get over it already
 
the only way a GT will handle that power(sn95)
is with a built motor same with a v6
both are the same price if anything the GT is more!
both will need a power adder
and a tune
and a tranny
and a built rear


now explain this
12psi v6 pushes 400rwhp
11-12psi v8 pushes 400rwhp


better platform huh?
 
dude i never said anything about cost, damn how many times do i have to say to factor out the money, everyone makes a different amount of money, its not a constant variable for everyone so its NOT A RELIABLE FACTOR, jesus, so with that being the case a GT would be faster than a v6, get over it already
dude HOW CAN YOU NOT FACTOR MONEY!!!
PARTS AND CARS DONT GET HANDED TO YOU!!!
like ive said what your saying makes no sense
in your case why not buy a bugatti?

your going back to stock vs stock
thats a dumbasses argument
 
dude i never said anything about cost, damn how many times do i have to say to factor out the money, everyone makes a different amount of money, its not a constant variable for everyone so its NOT A RELIABLE FACTOR, jesus, so with that being the case a GT would be faster than a v6, get over it already

this is the ORIGINAL POST
ok so right now i have pretty much a list of everything i wanna do to the ole 232........or.........i could spend that money and get a gt (dream car by the way)........which would be a better investment?


it seems as if its all about INVESTMENT!
MONEY
$$$$$$
thats why money is the major factor
 
not to take sides or anything but cant a gt could make more than 400 with a stock block example: just a kb supercharger kit will make 400+ hp on pump gas. so theroetically wouldnt a turbo kit make somewhere in the area of 500 hp? not trying to stir the pot anymore than it already is...
 
then it all depends on how much money he is talkin about, if he trades in his v6 and pays the difference to get a GT it all depends on whether or not the difference he paid is enough to mod out a v6 and make it faster than a stock GT, but who knows, he could have money left over still to mod the GT if he went that route
 
then it all depends on how much money he is talkin about, if he trades in his v6 and pays the difference to get a GT it all depends on whether or not the difference he paid is enough to mod out a v6 and make it faster than a stock GT, but who knows, he could have money left over still to mod the GT if he went that route
money left over after selling the v6 and buying the gt and having money left over?
 
not to take sides or anything but cant a gt could make more than 400 with a stock block example: just a kb supercharger kit will make 400+ hp on pump gas. so theroetically wouldnt a turbo kit make somewhere in the area of 500 hp? not trying to stir the pot anymore than it already is...
power is power just because its turbo doesnt mean it'll last if you put 500hp..

400rwhp is the area GT owner usually becareful around cause they know thats danger
 
161 - 180 of 313 Posts