I'm hoping someone can help me understand this better. I've been looking at some MAF sensors and injectors. I am looking for injectors for the 351 build I'm going to start real soon.
I was thinking about going with 42lb injectors to ensure they could support the power levels I am hoping to achieve. However, after reading some threads on the EEC tuning websites I have my doubts. Several people who seem to know a lot about tuning these A9L computers have stated that the 42lb injectors are junk and don't flow cosistent.
So that got me to thinking that maybe I was better off going with 60lb injectors and they have stated the 60's and 80's do flow within 1% of each other. Granted they do cost $150 more than the typical 42lb injectors but I'm willing to go that route if it equates to easier tuning, which according to some of them it does. I have found some Edelbrock injectors that fit the stock 91 Mustang harness. There are some others for the 4.6l engines that you can get adapters for to fit the stock harness of the 5.0 and I think that route is actually a little cheaper.
Has anyone ever used the 60lb injectors with the adapter plugs and did you have any problems?
My other questions are about the MAF. I can not find a MAF calibrated for 60lb injectors for the Fox Mustangs.
Does anyone know where I could find an MAF for 60lb injectors?
Also what direct effect does the tube have on the MAF sensor?
For example, I've seen several 75mm MAF sensors calibrated for 42lb injectors. I take that to mean the tube or pipe is 75mm in diameter and the sensor is meant for the larger injectors. But you can buy the tubes seperately.
If you were to put a 75mm MAF sensor on a larger tube what effect would it have on the sensor?
I am assuming it would throw off the MAF curve.
The reason I am asking about this is because I was actually wonder if 75mm would be a little small for a 351w with AFR heads and a super victor intake. An engine like this should really flow. The lightning trucks had a 90mm TB so I would think an engine like this would need a larger intake pipe.
Sorry for the long post. I try to be clear on my line of thinking.
I was thinking about going with 42lb injectors to ensure they could support the power levels I am hoping to achieve. However, after reading some threads on the EEC tuning websites I have my doubts. Several people who seem to know a lot about tuning these A9L computers have stated that the 42lb injectors are junk and don't flow cosistent.
So that got me to thinking that maybe I was better off going with 60lb injectors and they have stated the 60's and 80's do flow within 1% of each other. Granted they do cost $150 more than the typical 42lb injectors but I'm willing to go that route if it equates to easier tuning, which according to some of them it does. I have found some Edelbrock injectors that fit the stock 91 Mustang harness. There are some others for the 4.6l engines that you can get adapters for to fit the stock harness of the 5.0 and I think that route is actually a little cheaper.
Has anyone ever used the 60lb injectors with the adapter plugs and did you have any problems?
My other questions are about the MAF. I can not find a MAF calibrated for 60lb injectors for the Fox Mustangs.
Does anyone know where I could find an MAF for 60lb injectors?
Also what direct effect does the tube have on the MAF sensor?
For example, I've seen several 75mm MAF sensors calibrated for 42lb injectors. I take that to mean the tube or pipe is 75mm in diameter and the sensor is meant for the larger injectors. But you can buy the tubes seperately.
If you were to put a 75mm MAF sensor on a larger tube what effect would it have on the sensor?
I am assuming it would throw off the MAF curve.
The reason I am asking about this is because I was actually wonder if 75mm would be a little small for a 351w with AFR heads and a super victor intake. An engine like this should really flow. The lightning trucks had a 90mm TB so I would think an engine like this would need a larger intake pipe.
Sorry for the long post. I try to be clear on my line of thinking.