Like the title says....Ive been debating on taking the insert out of my factory GT hood scoop and trimmin out the hood to allow nice cold air under the hood. Is this a good idea or bad idea?
cant on thesewhy not just cut out below the scoop and flip the scoop around? :dunno functional heat extractor? or no :tomato, i was thinking of doing thatmaybe; just not with the hood in my sig
![]()
if thats the case he drove it threw a giant puddle and his coil boots need replacing.If you make your hood scoop functional you will be pulling in rain. A few weeks ago a member mentioned that it filled his spark plug holes and shorted out is COPs.
well thats off my to do list lolcant on thesethe scoop would it the plenum. the plenum is right behind the honey comb cut out of the hood.
I think you may have meant hood scoop. Yes, the original functional hood scoops forced air right to the carburator. My cowl hood is specifically designed to extract heat from the engine bay.Also a cowl hood was not designed to pull heat out. it was actually designed to help force air into the engine(as long as it is sealed to the air cleaner).
No , i meant that,. factory has been doing that for a long time....camaro's, chevelles,etc. research cowl hoods and you'll see what i meanI think you may have meant hood scoop. Yes, the original functional hood scoops forced air right to the carburator. My cowl hood is specifically designed to extract heat from the engine bay.
But Chevelles did have a trap door at the back of the hood that opened to help accomplish this. Most aftermarket cowl hoods are completely open in the back. I guess both could cause a vacuum at the back if they were sealed well. I could maybe see that maybe helping to pull air into the engine bay, but that would also extract some heat I would think.No , i meant that,. factory has been doing that for a long time....camaro's, chevelles,etc. research cowl hoods and you'll see what i mean
But Chevelles did have a trap door at the back of the hood that opened to help accomplish this. Most aftermarket cowl hoods are completely open in the back. I guess both could cause a vacuum at the back if they were sealed well. I could maybe see that maybe helping to pull air into the engine bay, but that would also extract some heat I would think.
I have to disagree to an extent on that last comment. My 93 fox had a harwood 4 inch cowl hood and after i washed it i would always have to clean off my chrome carb breather and valve covers cause the water got sucked in. I could see it goin in. I always thought it was wierd that it never went to the windshield. BUT that was a fox body idk if it be different on the newer cars or not but i would think the same aerodynamics would apply? Maybe its different because the fox bodies didnt have a big grille?? The hood came down between the headlights and the air passin under car made a vacuum and pulled the water drops off the cowl idkA cowl hood IS designed to vent air out the back. That is one of the two main uses (#2 is to clear over sized intake set ups). The air moving over the hood creates vacuum at the rear of the hood. That vacuum pulls hot air out from under the hood.
You can see it when driving in the rain. Water dripping down the raised section at the back of the hood flys off and up over the windshield. It's not getting sucked in.
original cowl induction system was optional on 1969 Camaros with 302 (Z-28), SS-350, SS-396, 427 (ZL-1) or the Cast Iron Block 427/425hp (COPO 9561) Camaros. The cowl induction system was also installed on dealership performance specials such as Yenko, Berger,Dana, Nickey or Baldwin-Motion.My '69 Camaro had fake chrome vents. The Chevelles of the time were the same.
Some Chevelles had a trap door that open also.My '69 Camaro had fake chrome vents. The Chevelles of the time were the same.