i was debating on when i order my on3 kit to either weld on a t6 flange in place of the t4 or running a pt88 turbo. Anybody got and suggestions??
bamasundown71
LOL, why? If you want better boost why not just use the T4 flange with a trick turbonetics huffer? Don't reinvent the wheel
im bound and determined to get around 900 out of this 2v people say it cant be done i want to prove them wrong lol
I promise you it can be done but a T6 is too much. If you have the bottom end and redline to handle it, go with a hybrid 80mm
900 is my goal also
but IMHO that pt88 is too big for 4.6 even 5.0
im in the middle of a build with tfs heads+stg2 turbo cams and 5.0 stroker(9.0 CR) with the master power t76
i will just see what that master power can make before i switch to precision PT7675
http://www.precisionturbo.net/Stree...e/ss/1-000-1-200HP/details/Street-and-Race-Turbocharger---PT7675-GT42-Style/280
just a week or 2 and i will have the results with the masterpower
im hoping it will be close to 800 - 750 rwhp ..
with the 76 i see full boost @ 3700 - 4000 rpm with 3.27 gears
so IMHO i dont think its a good idea to run anything bigger than 76 .. just my .02
i
but IMHO that pt88 is too big for 4.6 even 5.0
im in the middle of a build with tfs heads+stg2 turbo cams and 5.0 stroker(9.0 CR) with the master power t76
i will just see what that master power can make before i switch to precision PT7675
http://www.precisionturbo.net/Stree...e/ss/1-000-1-200HP/details/Street-and-Race-Turbocharger---PT7675-GT42-Style/280
just a week or 2 and i will have the results with the masterpower
im hoping it will be close to 800 - 750 rwhp ..
with the 76 i see full boost @ 3700 - 4000 rpm with 3.27 gears
so IMHO i dont think its a good idea to run anything bigger than 76 .. just my .02
i
waste of time, money and efforts. But none of the later mentioned are mine, so sure go for it, have a ball
gt stang let me know what you end up making i mean i guess the power im wanting may be out of the question to some degree, but my goal is i want a mid 9's car then ill be satisfied. i will be driving the car often but its not my daily driver just on nice days and such. the more i think about it ill prolly just stick with a ball bearing 76. My thing is where i normally go with my friends theres plenty of procharged vettes and TT vettes that i dont want to be the laughing stock of my crew. mainly i want it for me. 900 can be done and has been done but question is how? only way is to have every little thing possible and boost thats the only way with these motors. For instance look at the fast intentions 2v turbo car. its a stoker motor from mmr im sure its race ported heads from mmr. Custom intake and is got a different ignition system than the cop, and has a 88mm turbo kit. car runs 8.9 at 153 mph ! Its a full intereior car and has a cage so more weight added and still that fast. Ive talked to the owner once over a year ago but cant remember where or what he goes by and he drive the car on the street as well.
Their are 4v's making 1000rwhp eith 76-80mm t4 turbos dude.....with a pt88 and manual ur car would be a ****ing turd lol...
Look...... With a car having that kind of power is almost completely pointless. Just because it is possible, you have to ask, why on a streetcar? If its a drag car only and setup to run on slicks and have the suspension and all the supporting mods that it would take to sustain that power there really isnt any point. You will never hook on the street and you will not hook well at the track. You will virtually take all the fun out of your ride.
Im personally not wanting to go over the 650 mark because its just too much for it to be fun on the street.
This just my personal opinion and im not trying to rain on your parade. I am just speeking on personal experience.
Ohh, and going to a 76mm is a tight fit as it is. I am not sure that you can make it fit anyways.
Im personally not wanting to go over the 650 mark because its just too much for it to be fun on the street.
This just my personal opinion and im not trying to rain on your parade. I am just speeking on personal experience.
Ohh, and going to a 76mm is a tight fit as it is. I am not sure that you can make it fit anyways.
and when the fast inntentions car went 8.70s@160 it was not full interior car and was not driven on the street as much as you think lol...
Wow, now that's pure hurtful there! Lol.
I know they say bigger is better but there is always a suggested limit for best performance.....if you catch my.drift.
I know they say bigger is better but there is always a suggested limit for best performance.....if you catch my.drift.
im going to go out on a limb and guess the op just wants to brag to his friends that his car can make 1000hp but still be slower than a honda on the street due to not doing a compleat build. i understand hp is fun to talk about but track times are more important. i will be the first to say that it has been a learning experience for me as well being a horse power chaser in the past but now i run a moderatly powerful car in times that are considered decent. for 90% of the people on this site.
FYI motor is far from stock.... I have 2 motors stock I just bought for shits and gigs with bolt ons and a 300 cubic inch short block good for 1000. Debating on heads atm, working on finishing a 2 year build with that question but me and mikes done got the **** lined out my goal is a mid 9 car just was curious bout the pt88 and BTW 76 is not the biggest you can do a 80. And as far as my Dick goes I have to worry bout it dragging the ground before ill ever have to worry bout it being in a blender...
Sent from my ADR6350 using AutoGuide.com App
Sent from my ADR6350 using AutoGuide.com App
josh you can do an 88 but take some slim fans and no accessories to do it lol in front of the motor..alot of people kick them off to the side where the battery goes..
I am somewhat short ha ha almost 6ft but not quite and that's what I'm prolly gonna do a 76 or 80 from mike
Sent from my ADR6350 using AutoGuide.com App
Sent from my ADR6350 using AutoGuide.com App
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
