Modded Mustang Forums banner
Cancel
Create thread New Garage Forums

YSI or Turbo

Jump to Latest
21 - 40 of 71 Posts
#21 ·
condor123 said:
that kit has been around since late 2008 early 2009, Mr norms garage.(used to be modular power house) owns exclusive rights to the 2.8 kit. KB cant sell them to you untill next year

look how old this video is New Kenne Bell 2.8H 2V - YouTube
Click to expand...
Good ****, oh wait, that's the regular 2.8, that's not even the Mammoth. Holy **** balls, dude a Mammoth has to be good for 1200 give or take. Imagine the duty cycle of the 2.8 Mammoth at 700-750 hp.
 
#22 ·
Pate, If u want more cheap HP. Add a shot of nitrous. Have you consider doing a tune with 93+ Torco. It's just like racing fuel but alot cheaper.
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
Discussion starter · #23 ·
needparts said:
Pate, If u want more cheap HP. Add a shot of nitrous. Have you consider doing a tune with 93+ Torco. It's just like racing fuel but alot cheaper.
Click to expand...
I'm not really interested in nitrous anymore I want something on tap without a refill worry.for the record JayC i don't really care about the track I'm after more of a feeling of power and speed ill run my hartop Shelby GT 500 at the track when i get home long enough to shop for one. I was going to drag my car back down to Bragg with me and get into touch with wicked96 but i ran out of time this week to work all that out.

I wouldn't mind the YSI but i don't want to be disappointed once again if it don't get me over this hump. What about these ON3 turbos?
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#24 ·
Your best bet is turbo it. But a YSi, aggressive cams, and good amount of boos will get you there.

For reliability. And definitely hitting your goal, turbo is the way to go. If your dissapointed, turn the boost up with a boost controller (as long as you have one and enough fuel)
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
Discussion starter · #25 ·
Shaun13GT/CS said:
Your best bet is turbo it. But a YSi, aggressive cams, and good amount of boos will get you there.

For reliability. And definitely hitting your goal, turbo is the way to go. If your dissapointed, turn the boost up with a boost controller (as long as you have one and enough fuel)
Click to expand...
As long as I can stay on pump gas it don't matter the YSI would be a direct swap for me and might even work well with my cams.
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#26 ·
I'm sorry, I don't want to bring the cams issue up again. Might hurt people's feelings (not yours or kurgans...others)


They very well could. Only one way to find out.


I would honestly look at running meth. **** snow, their systems are garbage. Your gonna be making about 23-28psi (if pullied for it) don't know how much compression you have? Even if its 8.5:1 you'll have to go low on timing. Assuming its about 9.5:1 probably run a max of like 12* of timing if that. That'll be robbing you of a good bit of power.
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#27 ·
If you want a YSI, put a 18% OD with electric water pump , 2.75 High Traction Pulley and you should have agood amount of boost to get you there.. Pate, I'm not knocking you one bit, but I was just like you. I wanted nothing less than 750hp. When I only got at first 620. I was someehat happy. Then I realized I didn't really need that much HP. I really only wanted a car that had good hp that would last me awhile. When I got my motor built. I saw online acouple other guys with new builds. Since that time. 2 have blown there motors. I told my self. I would settle with +600 and it last me along time (+10 yrs) than have higher HP and only last me 2yrs or so.. it was also funny not too long ago wife and I went to the store in the Stang. I told her she couldn't buy alot of stuff because it wouldn't fit in my car. But she still bought alot of groceries and my trunk and back seat was full. I told her this is why I needed all those HP in my car.. To haul back all the stuff she bought..lol
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#28 ·
go turbo skip all this blower ****. stock worrying about belts and all this. For your goals only see a single or twins getting where you want to be on 93. But ur just wanting a dyno number 700-750 thru an unlocked converter is like 800rwhp thru a manual.. Ur dyno number goal is up there for a pump gas setup. I also bet you would just be happy with more than 550rwhp give you mid 600s and i bet that would be enough for you lol. But like i said go turbo. No on3 ****. If single go with a billet 76mm or if your really antsy just go to a mid frame 80mm or 8285mm and that will make more than ur goal. With a boost controller you can keep it low and if you ever feel greedy just turn the knob up a few lbs on the same tune and ur good.
 
#29 ·
thereal2v2fear said:
I'd go turbo if I was you. Seems like you have a hunger for hp numbers instead of track times.

This guys making 765rwhp/752hp, But it's on e85.
What Will it Make? - MustangForums.com

I'll find out what I'm making on E85 and my YSI before the end of next month hopefully.
Click to expand...
Im very confused here. The turbo wil net better track times as well

---------- Post added at 10:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:08 AM ----------

I agree with Slow...a Billet 7675 t4 with a .96AR will rip! An 80mm turbo is pretty good size but for 750rwhp 2v with an unlock stall it might not be a bad idea. Precision has a CEA(billet) 8284 t4 turbo. I want to run that when I do a 4v motor. A turbo will be easier for you and no pulley bs to worry about with slip and all that crap. on3 turbo wont have a big enough downpipe so you'll need to upgrade that ASAP. a CG FAB setup and have kurgan finish it will be your best bet
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#30 ·
slow02gt said:
go turbo skip all this blower ****. stock worrying about belts and all this. For your goals only see a single or twins getting where you want to be on 93. But ur just wanting a dyno number 700-750 thru an unlocked converter is like 800rwhp thru a manual.. Ur dyno number goal is up there for a pump gas setup. I also bet you would just be happy with more than 550rwhp give you mid 600s and i bet that would be enough for you lol. But like i said go turbo. No on3 ****. If single go with a billet 76mm or if your really antsy just go to a mid frame 80mm or 8285mm and that will make more than ur goal. With a boost controller you can keep it low and if you ever feel greedy just turn the knob up a few lbs on the same tune and ur good.
Click to expand...
He's already at 600 and wants more...

I'm still going to say turbo with boost controller to adjust it to what you want.
 
Discussion starter · #32 ·
Yes thats on E-85, and since its getting to be a pain in the ass getting it I want to step away and get a setup that makes killer power on pump gas so I can actually drive my car around without having to carry extra fuel.

So if I go turbo, I will have to remove the Innovators, and my 8 rib stuff? Man this is gong to be a big project if I go that route. I am really feeling a turbo this time, but im not sure what Im going to do with the blower, and all the parts and pices I have with it. Mayeb ill try to put it on my F-150. Im going to make a few calls and see what all is needed to make this happen, I do not want to purchase anything without knowing my goal is being met.

---------- Post added at 01:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:13 PM ----------

needparts said:
Pate, If u want more cheap HP. Add a shot of nitrous. Have you consider doing a tune with 93+ Torco. It's just like racing fuel but alot cheaper.
Click to expand...
This is intresting, but im not sure if we have this fuel in our area either as I have never seen it.
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
Discussion starter · #36 ·
joshdj13 said:
If I were you I'd call Bob and see what he recommends since he already knows so much about your car and can better advise you on what direction to go.
Click to expand...
I just shot him an email hopefully ill heat back soon. If this Torco turns out to be good **** then I may have a resolution all together.
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#37 ·
SSG Pate said:
I just shot him an email hopefully ill heat back soon. If this Torco turns out to be good **** then I may have a resolution all together.
Click to expand...
i have a crazy idea, do 4v twin turbo in the mustang, then put your built 2v with the t trim on your truck:)
 
#39 ·
750rwhp on pump gas sounds sketchy at best lol

I'm going to be honest, first you need to switch over to a turbo setup.

Second I would highly recommend looking into some sort of race fuel such as MS109. You can probably make 750 on pump gas but I wouldn't recommend doing it on such a small motor for the risk of detonation.
 
Discussion starter · #40 ·
sharkbait said:
750rwhp on pump gas sounds sketchy at best lol

I'm going to be honest, first you need to switch over to a turbo setup.

Second I would highly recommend looking into some sort of race fuel such as MS109. You can probably make 750 on pump gas but I wouldn't recommend doing it on such a small motor for the risk of detonation.
Click to expand...
We had a **** load of E85 stations here locally then they all just died out. We have race fuel at just about every other gas station though at the tune of 6.99 a gallon. I thought the vortech would take me further but its not, but on the other hand in running 17-18 psi and the blower is capable of more but now sure how much. A big turbo sounds better and better but I have so much invested in my blower setup its not even funny.
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
21 - 40 of 71 Posts
About this Discussion
70 Replies
27 Participants
Last post:
Scott2001GT
Modded Mustang Forums
posts
6.3M
members
83K
Since
2005
A forum community dedicated to all Ford Mustang owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, racing, builds, modifications, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
96 - 04 Modular Mustangs 5.0 Mustangs New Members Introductions Classic Mustangs